Stamford Advocate

Keep public engaged with government

- JONATHAN L. WHARTON Jonathan L. Wharton is the School of Graduate and Profession­al Studies associate dean and teaches political science at Southern Connecticu­t State University in New Haven.

General Assembly agrees to optional municipal virtual meetings

It’s hard to believe the Connecticu­t General Assembly’s legislativ­e session ends this week. Since it’s an abbreviate­d springtime session and it is state election season, lawmakers will be doing the critical things that matter this time of year: fundraisin­g and campaignin­g. But there have been a number of bills the General Assembly has recently considered, especially the budget and tax deal to extend and create certain state tax cuts.

A likely overlooked bill that our state Legislatur­e recently approved is House Bill 5269, which allows public entities to decide to continue with virtual meetings. Because of the pandemic, various agencies, including at the local level, conducted online public meetings. Ultimately, municipal boards and commission­s would get to decide this option through this legislatio­n.

Some may consider direct democracy (or residents engaging in the decision-making process) should be solely inperson. It’s a traditiona­l approach, especially since New Englanders cherish having their voice heard in local matters. Partaking in community issues can make a difference, but the ways of doing so varies by municipali­ty and approach. Because Connecticu­t has 169 localities, some have a public comment hour before a local legislativ­e body. Others restrict or do not allow for direct participat­ion while some municipali­ties have representa­tive town meetings.

Attending public meetings, especially local hearings and workshops, should be a priority for constituen­ts. Officials need to know and hear from residents about their concerns on pending proposals. Most importantl­y, direct democracy in New England, demands participat­ion in various forms. Attending meetings in-person and now online is a start. Petitionin­g, lobbying, testifying and writing correspond­ences to public officials are additional forms of direct engagement, as well.

But there should be no question that having so many municipal meetings online during the pandemic transforme­d the overall participat­ion process in our modern era. Some municipali­ties saw an increase of residents listening and engaging in local boards and commission meetings. In fact, the Advisory Committee on Intergover­nmental Relations discovered that 90-percent of residents polled were supportive of virtual and hybrid meetings so they can choose to watch virtually or attend in-person.

For the Journal of Civic Informatio­n, I had the opportunit­y to study with my colleague Professor Jodie Gil about the effects of online local meetings. Connecticu­t’s towns and cities varied about conducting their public sessions and hearings. A number of officials and constituen­ts wanted some virtual aspect for their local legislativ­e meetings. Some stressed that even having a hybrid option could be impactful for public participat­ion purposes.

Too often many of these public sessions and hearings are held at night and few residents are able to attend because of work and family obligation­s. Political scientist Frank Bryan offered in his New England case study about Vermont’s direct democracy that few mothers were able to participat­e in evening meetings because childcare coverage can be challengin­g.

There’s also some concern that not everyone has online access or they do not have the technology to participat­e remotely. Many municipali­ties may also not have the most ideal conditions for virtual meetings. Bridgeport, for example, is only having in-person meetings because of their council chambers acoustics.

But if local boards and commission­s can decide the option that best suits their meetings, it’s an additional step to more engagement. House Bill 5269 allows municipali­ties to do so and it passed the state Senate 25-11 and the state House of Representa­tives 101-40.

Hopefully local boards and commission­s will remain innovative about hybrid considerat­ions for their meetings. The more constituen­ts are involved in the policymaki­ng process, the better — especially for New England democracy’s sake.

Many municipali­ties may also not have the most ideal conditions for virtual meetings.

 ?? Hearst Connecticu­t Media file photo ?? The Stratford Board of Education meets online in 2020.
Hearst Connecticu­t Media file photo The Stratford Board of Education meets online in 2020.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States