Mutual distrust hampering early progress in Syria talks
Both sides frustrated with pace of negotiations to end long conflict.
GENEVA — Both sides in the Syria peace negotiation expressed frustration Tuesday with the sluggish progress of the talks, raising new doubts about the viability of the most determined diplomatic push to date aimed at ending the nation’s almost five-year conflict.
The renewed sense of uncertainty came a day after the chief United Nations mediator, Staffan de Mistura, confidently declared that the talks had officially “started,” allaying fears that the process could collapse before it began.
But mutual distrust between the two sides — the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad and the leading opposition delegation — remained Tuesday.
Talks on any substantive issues do not appear tohave taken place.
The opposition bloc demanded an end to ongoing government advances in Syria, citing Syrian army thrusts outside the cities of Homs and Aleppo. Airstrikes by Russia, a Syrian ally, have helped government forces push forward on a number of battlefronts since Moscow intervened in September.
“Our first goal is to try to pressure toward stopping this escalation,” Fara Atassi, a member of the leading opposition committee, told reporters outside U.N. headquarters in Geneva.
The opposition committee has insisted that substantive talks cannot begin until the Syrian government and its allies take several steps, including ending bombardment and sieges of rebel-held areas and releasing some prisoners. The government says it will not accept “preconditions” but is willing to discuss proposals formally on the table.
“The regime’s and Russia’s actions gravely threaten the political process at this early stage,” Atassi said in a statement. “We need the international community to take immediate, serious and clear steps to ensure the credibility of this process.”
One of the goals of the Geneva talks is to achieve a lasting cease-fire in Syria as a prelude to government reform, the writing of a new constitution and U.N.backed elections in Syria. But Damascus has given no indication that it is willing to cease broad offensive operations absent a negotiated settlement.
Damascus’ negotiating team complained that vagueness clouded the Geneva process.
“So far, nothing is clear,” declared Bashar Ja’afari, the chief government negotiator, in comments to reporters. “There are no clear answers. What is the agenda of the meeting? … The important procedural issues have not yet been dealt with.”
In particular, the government is perturbed that it has not been provided with a list of the names of the opposition delegates.
The Geneva negotiations will not be face-to-face sit-downs but rather “proximity talks,” in which opposing sides remain in separate rooms. U.N. mediators will shuttle from delegation to delegation. Still, Syrian government officials say they want to know who is on the other side.
The U.N. has effectively named a Saudi-based opposition umbrella group, called the High Negotiations Committee, or HNC, as the chief opposition delegation, though the U.N. also has invited other opponents in apparent observer roles. The committee includes both Syrian political dissidents and representatives of several armed rebel militias.
Damascus and Moscow consider a pair of the Islamist armed factions represented in the opposition committee to be terrorists.
The opposition bloc has dismissed as extraneous the government’s complaints about not knowing the identities of those with whom it is supposed to be negotiating.
“Our names are available and our names are known, and we represent many people, many Syrians,” Atassi said. “We are a sample of the opposition.”