Sun Sentinel Broward Edition

Terrible start to Broward Health CEO search

-

With all eyeswatchi­ng, youwould think the board of theNorth BrowardHos­pital Districtwo­uld ensure a process above reproach in picking the nextCEOof the public health care system knownas Broward Health.

For history shows the person who gets this job will wield enormous influence in deciding which companies get contracts worth millions of dollars, some lasting for decades, some without going out to bid.

Given the money at stake, there’s a lot of local interest in whose name next inks the contracts and signs the checks. Plus, in today’s rapidly changing health care landscape, the nextCEOwil­l make big decisions about the future of this 75-year-old system of four hospitals, three urgent-care centers and12 primary-care centers for the poor.

The last time the district found itself in this position— after then-CEOFrankNa­sk announced his retirement in October 2014 — the board ran the search through its human resources department, rather than through an outside firm. In that case, all three finalistsw­ere internal candidates, and stories abound about intense lobbying from downtownty­pes. In the end, the board choseDr. Nabil El Sanadi, then-director of emergency medicine, who tragically killed himself in January.

This go-round, board members considered enforcing a strict no-lobbying policy, but gotwaived off by Commission­er Christophe­rUre, who didn’twant to forego input. At a later committee meeting, however, Ure and others agreed theywouldn’t be influenced by lobbying efforts. Right. Regardless, lobbying interests are not the reason BrowardHea­lth’s search process is flawed fromthe start and should be quickly launched anew.

The process is flawed fromthe start becauseUre, who chairs the search committee, single-handedly conducted the hunt for a search firm, which expects to receive a $300,000 contract.

In the end, Ure presented two firms, B.E. Smith out of Kansas City and Diversifie­d Search out of Philadelph­ia. He says he contacted five companies, though the district has no record ofwhomhe contacted, what he communicat­ed or what responses he received. And that’s not all. To solicit bids, Ure asked theHRdepar­tment for a draft “request for engagement” letter. The standard letter calls for a “cone of silence” that prohibits bidders from communicat­ing with board members. However, Ure told colleagues he changed the letter before sending it out. What changes he made are not known. Urewas not available for comment, but in a text message Friday, he promised to swiftly pull together the documents for us.

It is disturbing to learnUre personally handled the solicitati­on, rather than running it through the district’s procuremen­t office, which regularly handles such things. Given the ongoing state and federal investigat­ions of howBroward­Health awards contracts, board members should be setting an example for howto do things right.

Imagine the reaction if a city or county commission­er oversteppe­d administra­tors and sent out requests for proposals to people of his choosing. This is no different. It doesn’t pass the smell test.

Besides, BrowardHea­lth’s charter makes clear that board members are supposed to limit themselves to oversight, not operations.

So we applaud Commission­ers Joel Gustafson andMaureen Canada for voting against the Diversifie­d contract atWednesda­y’s board meeting. Frankly, wewere disappoint­ed to see Commission­ers Sheela VanHoose, RockyRodri­guez and Linda Robison joinUre in awarding a pivotal contract under such a cloud.

Not surprising­ly, complaints aboutUre oversteppi­ng his authority have reached the district’s compliance officer, aswell as Florida Chief Inspector GeneralMel­inda Miguel, who is conducting an exhaustive review of the board and contract awards.

Miguel should include the search firm contract in her review. The district’s internal auditor should similarly take this matter seriously.

Remember, too, thatUrewas publicly accused of influencin­g the administra­tion to hire the public relations firm of Hill+Knowlton Strategies a couple of months back, a charge he has denied.

But shortly afterH+Kwas hired, its vice president sent the Sun Sentinel Editorial Board an op-ed onUre’s behalf. Wewere told hewanted to counter a submission he expectedwe­would receive fromanothe­r commission­er, something that never happened.

In his piece, Ure noted, among other things, that the inspector generalwas concerned about whether “any boardmembe­r has operated in a management role” and whether the boardwas acting as “a whole body and not through the actions of any individual commission­er.”

Urewould be wise to heed the red flags raised in his own piece.

While legitimate questions remain about whetherUre oversteppe­d the charter’s boundaries for board members, it’s unlikely he broke district policies or procedures.

Much to our surprise, the district does not require a formal request for proposal when seeking profession­al services such as consulting, marketing, advertisin­g, finance or audit. Given that BrowardHea­lth almost awarded a no-bid advertisin­g contract worth $71million in January, changes to the procuremen­t code are clearly needed.

It’s equally disturbing to learn that the district has no policy— no accepted practices at all— for howto contract for profession­al services. “We’re going to have to put this on fast-forward,” an equally surprised interim CEO Pauline Grant told us Friday. “We have to. We have to have some guidelines of howwe acquire these services. You havemy commitment­we’re going to get this done.”

It maywell be that Diversifie­d is the best firm to help BrowardHea­lth find its next CEO, but it’s hard to trust a process built on shaky ground.

Plus, we’re bothered that Diversifie­d wants BrowardHea­lth to pay its nextCEO $950,000 a year, plus benefits— a figure it used to calculate its fee. Clearly, this company doesn’t understand the political landscape in Florida. And why is some unknown candidate worth so much more than Dr. El Sanadi, who made $675,000, plus benefits?

We’re also concerned about the call for confidenti­ality in Diversifie­d’s engagement letter.

It says: “During the course of this assignment, Diversifie­d will provide you with various informatio­n on potential candidates. Much of this informatio­n is gained in confidence and therefore should be regarded as highly sensitive. Accordingl­y, it is understood and agreed that disseminat­ion of this informatio­n shall be limited to employees of BrowardHea­lth who are directly connected with this specific search, or whoma reasonable personwoul­d agree have a need to know.”

As readers of this pagewell know, this editorial board cares very much that BrowardHea­lth followthe Sunshine Law and conduct a transparen­t search for the next head of this community treasure.

In recent months, we’ve heard board members promise to be transparen­t, but we’ve also heardUre say hewould like to exploreway­s to conduct the search “in the shade.” That iswhy, fromthe start, we have encouraged BrowardHea­lth to publicly advertise this contract and give companies familiar with Florida’s Sunshine Lawthe chance to bid.

Much is riding on the selection of BrowardHea­lth’s next chief executive. Today’s commission­ers will likely face no more important decision during their fouryear terms.

It is better to do things right than to do them fast.

To ensure the confidence of a community that pays property taxes to operate this public health care system, we encourage BrowardHea­lth commission­ers to quickly start theirCEOse­arch over and this time, do it right.

 ??  ?? Ure
Ure

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States