GOP applying the brakes on tax bill
After initial rush, Congress is slowed by revision process
WASHINGTON — The rush to finish the GOP tax overhaul has snagged slightly as Republicans grapple with substantial differences between the House and Senate bills, and pause to consider unintended consequences of the most extensive rewrite of the tax code in a generation.
Lawmakers are eager to pass the bill, President Donald Trump’s top domestic priority, by Christmas, but they are also increasingly wary of political fallout from the hurried process and want to prevent embarrassing moments, like the scribbled text hastily added to the margin of the final Senate bill.
The end of any major legislative undertaking is often a sprint to the finish. But the final stretch of the GOP tax plan is being complicated by an accelerated process like none other in recent history.
“Republicans have made a decision, which I can’t fault them for, that the longer this bill hangs out there, the more barnacles attach,” said Jonathan Traub, the former Republican staff director at the House Ways and Means Committee and now managing principal at Deloitte’s tax policy group. “We’ve seen time and time again, big issues left out in the sun too long start to attract vultures. They need to move quickly to take advantage of the enthusiasm.”
Lawmakers are set to convene Wednesday for the first — and perhaps only — open meeting of a conference committee tasked with reconciling the House and Senate versions of the tax bills.
The Republican staffs met privately over the weekend, and leaders fielded calls with Trump and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, as they cobble together a final version without Democratic input. As the majority in Congress, Republicans are relying on special budget rules to pass the bill on their own to bypass the threat of a Democratic filibuster.
Yet even with control of the House, Senate and the White House, Republicans have struggled to resolve differences over individual income brackets, allowable deductions and when corporate rate cuts will take effect. A hoped for deal over the weekend did not materialize as talks continued.
The legislation is already bumping against the $1.5 trillion cap Republicans are allowing in deficit spending, but many changes lawmakers want to make — like reinstating a planned repeal of the medical expenses deduction or shelving an idea to tax graduate student tuition stipends — have left them scrambling to make tweaks elsewhere to pay for them. Both Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., have said that the tax cuts wouldn't add to budget deficits.
One possible change now being debated is whether to nudge the corporate tax rate, now proposed to drop from 35 percent to 20 percent in both bills, up to 21 percent or 22 percent. There continues to be deep resistance from GOP business allies, even though Trump has said he would be open to it. Such a shift would generate some $200 billion to pay for other provisions of the plan.
The president is set to address the nation Wednesday about the proposal.
Normally at this stage of the legislative process, lawmakers and staff would be pouring over the text, trying to catch typos and thinking through the bill’s logic to prevent any unforeseen consequences.
But under the GOP’s fasttrack process, the bill is still being written the week before a likely vote.
Republicans compare their undertaking to the last major overhaul, under then-President Ronald Reagan in 1986, sometimes posting photos of themselves from that era to emphasize how long it’s been since the last revision.
McConnell and others disregard complaints about the process. Republicans point to how Democrats pushed the Affordable Care Act through the Senate in a Christmas Eve vote and then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi famously suggested that Americans would like the bill once they saw what was in it. Even so, that legislation went though more than a year of hearings, town halls and debates before a final vote.
Though Republicans have been talking about tax reform for years in policy proposals and dozens of congressional hearings, critics say they have not subjected the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to the kind of legislative scrutiny typical of hundreds-page bills.
The 1986 measure underwent so many hearings they were numbered, like the Superbowl, with Roman numerals, hitting XXVII at one point, Democrats said.
Democrats note that the 100-year-old state and local tax deduction, first enacted during the Civil War-era and reinstated in the early 20th century, barely had a hearing before being put on the chopping block for repeal. After a backlash in high-tax states, the House and Senate bills eventually allowed property tax deductions up to $10,000. Talks are underway to permit that write-off for any kind of state or local tax, including income and property taxes.
A Treasury Department report Monday sought to assure lawmakers that the cost of the $1.5 trillion package would be more than paid for by future economic growth. But the one-page report was widely criticized because it relied heavily on separate and as-of-yet unannounced future initiatives for infrastructure development and welfare reform. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., called the report “fake math."