Sun Sentinel Broward Edition

Palm Beach County can help seniors without ruining Ag Reserve

- Randy Schultz

Who could be against letting Palm Beach County residents “age in place?” As they got older and frailer and had to leave longtime homes, they could move to an elder care facility but stay near their support group.

It’s a wonderful idea. But it would be wrong to allow it on a large scale in the Agricultur­al Reserve Area.

Two developers seek to build congregate living facilities in the reserve, which runs from Clint Moore Road to Lantana Road west of the Florida Turnpike. One project is before the county commission today. Despite the projects’ lyrical names — Allegro and Poet’s Walk — the commission should remember what county voters demanded nearly 20 years ago.

That demand was to preserve as much farming and related uses in the reserve as possible. Voters were so adamant that they taxed themselves $100 million for land purchases to discourage excessive suburban-type developmen­t that could drive out farmers.

Nothing prevents the developers from building Allegro — at Clint Moore west of the turnpike — and Poet’s Walk — at Lyons Road and Atlantic Avenue west of Delray Beach. The problem is that they want to build more than the rules allow.

Allegro could have 30 beds on nearly 13 acres. The developer wants to build 235 beds. Poets Walk could have 23 beds on almost 10 acres. The developer wants 186 beds. If you didn’t know the history of the Agricultur­al Reserve Area — especially that voter intent — the proposals might seem acceptable. Would 421 beds to make life better for seniors be so bad? The plan for the reserve cites a need for “additional forms of institutio­nal uses and housing opportunit­ies” to create “a balanced and thriving community.”

But the county’s “objective” is to “preserve the unique farmland and wetlands in order to preserve and enhance agricultur­al activity, environmen­tal and water resources, and open space within the Agricultur­al Reserve Tier. This shall be accomplish­ed by limiting uses to agricultur­e and conservati­on with residentia­l developmen­t restricted to low densities (italics mine) . .” The county also states that the reserve “shall be preserved primarily for agricultur­al use, reflecting the unique farmlands and wetlands within it.”

By any definition, developmen­t eight times more intense than allowed would be high-density. A project that proposed eight times more single-family homes than allowed on a property would be problemati­c. That doesn’t change when the project is a facility that would provide options for seniors depending on their health. A bad precedent for congregate living facilities could set a bad precedent for all types of housing.

Even those who voted for the $100 million to buy land understood that some developmen­t would happen in the reserve. The county has approved 10,000 residentia­l units and could allow another 2,500. Rules allow two shopping centers on the east side of the reserve. The more southern one, Delray Marketplac­e, draws many people who live outside the reserve.

The challenge has been to keep the reserve from becoming so suburbaniz­ed that farming becomes incompatib­le. On one side are the benefits from green space and a healthy agricultur­e industry in South Florida’s only coastal farm belt. On the other is the continued pressure from developers seeking open land in Palm Beach County.

Under that pressure, county commission­ers have weakened the rules here and there. They did so most recently for small farmers who complained that they couldn’t make a living but were “forced to farm” because they couldn’t make top dollar selling to developers.

GL Homes also continues to float its proposal that the company build 2,500 more homes in the reserve than rules allow in exchange for preserving land outside the reserve on which GL got approval to build. Since the commission wrongly allowed GL to build 10 times more homes on the other site, such a deal would reward GL, not the public.

On senior living facilities, county planners have offered commission­ers the option of creating rules just for such projects. The Allegro developers asked to delay their planned hearing today with Poet’s Walk so the commission can provide the staff with “further direction.”

Since the staff and the planning commission had recommende­d denial of both projects, Allegro’s tactic amounts to a strategic retreat. A compromise might be possible, but only if the result doesn’t compromise what the public demanded.

Email Randy Schultz: randy@bocamag.com

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States