Senate GOP marches ahead on Barrett over Dem hurdles
WASHINGTON — The Senate is poised for a rare weekend session as Republicans race to put Amy Coney Barrett on the SupremeCourtandcement a conservative majority before Election Day despite Democratic efforts to stall President Donald Trump’s nominee.
Democrats mounted time-consuming procedural hurdles Friday, but the party has no realistic chance of stopping Barrett’s advance in the Republicanchamber. Barrett, a federal appeals court judge, is expected to be confirmed Monday and quickly join the court.
Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of NewYorkwarnedRepublicans that theywere making a“colossal andhistoric mistake.”
Republicans appeared unmoved. In a lengthy speech, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell praised Barrett as an “extraordinary” nominee and defended her quick confirmation. “We will give this nominee the vote she deserves no later than Monday,” he said.
Barrett, 48, presented herself in public testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee as a neutral arbiter of cases on abortion, the Affordable Care Act and presidential power — issues soon confronting the court. At one point she suggested, “It’s not the law ofAmy.”
But Barrett’s past writings against abortion and a ruling on the Obama-era health care law show a deeply conservative thinker.
Trump said thisweek he is hopeful the Supreme Court will undo the health law when the justices take up a challenge Nov. 10, the week after the election.
The fast-track confirmation process is like none other in U.S. history so close to a presidential election.
Schumer called it the “least legitimate process in the country’s history” as he forced procedural steps, including an unusual private Senate session, in hopes of changing Republicans’ minds.
But Republicans quickly convened, then ended, the closed-door meeting, pushing forward. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, dismissed the stall tactics as “frivolous.”
Most Republicans are supportingBarrett’s confirmation. Only Republican Sen. Susan Collins ofMaine has said shewon’t vote for a nominee so close to the presidential election.
Another, Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, early on said she would prefer not to vote ahead of the election. But in a statement Thursday, Murkowski said now that the process is moving forward, the decision on whether to vote to confirm Barrett is one “each senator has to make on their own.”
Republicans on the Judiciary Committee powered Barrett’s nomination forward Thursday despite a boycott of the vote by Democrats.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, the committee chairman, acknowledged the partisan nature of the proceedings, but said he could not live with himself if the Senate failed to confirm someone who he said was such an exceptional nominee. Graham, R-S.C., calledBarrett a “role model” for conservative women and for people with strongly held religious beliefs.
Democrats decried the “sham” process and said Barrett would undo much of what was accomplished by JusticeRuthBader Ginsburg, who died lastmonth.
By pushing for Barrett’s ascension so close to the Nov. 3 election, Trump and his Republican allies are counting on a campaign boost, inmuchtheway they believeMcConnell’s refusal to allow the Senate to consider President Barack Obama’s nominee in February 2016 created excitement for Trump among conservatives and evangelical Christians eager for theRepublican president to make that nomination after Justice Antonin Scalia’s death.
In trying to derail or at least slow Barrett’s confirmation, Democrats argue the winner of the presidential election should decide who replaces Ginsburg.