Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

‘What did we win?’ Afghans ask at village razed in US offensive

- By Kevin Sieff

TAROK KOLACHE, Afghanista­n — It took 50,000 pounds of American explosives to levelNiazM­ohammad’s village.

The village had become aTaliban stronghold, a virtual factory for bombs that killed and maimed American soldiers. At the height of the U.S. offensive in late 2010, commanders chose what they considered their best option: They approved an airstrike that flattened all the buildings in town, more than 40, including Mohammad’s home. Though no civilians were killed, the bombardmen­t quickly became one of the most controvers­ial attacks of the war in Afghanista­n.

Three years later, the village is a sandy ruin, symbolizin­g the gains and losses of America’s longest war. A handful of villagers, among them Mohammad, have trickled back. TheU.S. Army withdrew this summer from the valley where Tarok Kolache is located. TheTaliban have mostly fled to other districts.

Relative peace came to Tarok Kolache, but only after itwas demolished.

“What did we win in this war? We lost our homes. We lost our village,” said Mohammad, 47, the village’s de facto patriarch, with thick black eyebrows and a wavy saltand-pepper beard. “The Taliban do not live here anymore, but they were only fighting in the first place because the Americans were here.”

On the other side of the world, the man who decided to bombTarokK­olache, Army Col. David Flynn, sits in his office at a base in Oklahoma, hoping that his “painstakin­g choice” has paid off.

“I think about Tarok Kolache every day,” Flynn said. “There were no good options there.”

Mohammadwa­soneof thefewwhoh­ave returned to his ancestral village, now only partially rebuilt. In a country still peppered with rusty 40-year-old Russian tanks and long-decayed 130-year-old British forts, Tarok Kolache already feels like another relic ofwar.

To compensate the villagers for the loss of their 100-year-old homes, the U.S. military built them square, concrete rooms. But those structures — oddities in a valley of mud-baked dwellings — are already cracking. Locals refuse to live in them, so the buildings sit empty, full of wasp nests, the subject of mockery. There are still the barbed wire and blast barriers brought here to protect the U.S. base at the edge of the village, constructe­d after theTarokKo­lache bombing. The base itself has since been dismantled.

Mostly, there are sand, rocks and empty space where there once were homes. Some residents receivedup­to$10,000incompe­nsation from the U.S. military and moved elsewhere. Some said it was too dangerous to stay in Tarok Kolache after the U.S. base was establishe­d. Some said it still smelled like death after several Taliban members were killed. Many claimed the Americans failed to rebuild what they had promised.

“For us, it was like a deadly poison,” said Abdul Hamid, a former resident who moved to the nearby city of Kandahar after the operation, claiming he was compensate­d for only a fraction of his property.

Mohammad felt compelled to go home, though now he wonders whether it was a good idea. His family has been in Tarok Kolache for150year­s, farming acres of nearby land. The Taliban insinuated itself into the village around 2008, turning it into one of the most prolific bomb factories in Kandahar province, according to U.S. officials. Soldiers started referring to its “house-borne improvised explosive devices,” a play on “vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices,” the military expression for car bombs.

Mohammad and his fellow villagers say they were never supportive of theTaliban; the insurgents had chased or scared many of them out of their homes. But he claims the series of events that ended with the destructio­n of his village started with the American invasion in 2001. “If the Americans hadn’t come, we would still have our village,” he said.

The bombing didn’t kill any civilians, but it stood out for the scale of its destructio­n. Before and after satellite pictures released in the aftermath of the attack showa cluster of houses that seemed to vanish into the desert. Crops on nearby land were destroyed. U.S. officialsw­ere quick to call the operation a success. Afghan members of theU.S.backed government said it was tragic but necessary. Both groups pointed to the proof: The Taliban left Tarok Kolache.

“The other option was to keep patting the ground by hand, looking for IEDs,” Flynn said. “After losing several guys, we found it wasn’t worth the risk.”

Flynn watched as the airstrike was carried out, knowing it would weaken the enemy but infuriate many locals. He thinks his decision, supported by top American commanders, was the right one.

“Leadership isn’t about being the most popular guy on the street,” he said. “It’s about getting the job done and improving a bad environmen­t.” There were objections not only from Afghan civilians but also from American academics and analysts, who said it was an exampleof the unnecessar­y use of force. For some outside the military, Tarok Kolache became a symbol of the Afghan war’s poor execution.

Mohammad learned about the American debate over Tarok Kolache months after it began raging on blogs and op-ed pages. He asked an English-speaking friend in Kandahar city to search the name of his village on Google. He couldn’t believe what he saw â” a seemingly endless back-and-forth about whether Tarok Kolache’s destructio­n was justified.

“Itwas amazing— I didn’t knowwewere famous in TarokKolac­he,” he said, smiling.

U.S. officials said they tried to be systematic about compensati­ng villagers, either rebuilding their homes or paying them to constructn­ewones elsewhere. But itwasn’t always easy or successful.

“We ran into our own bureaucrac­y,” Flynn said.

TheU.S. military had a policy of compensati­ng all individual­s equally, even though some villagers owned many homes in the village and others had only one.

Fourteen of the homes in Tarok Kolache, for instance, were owned by one man, Abdul Hamid. The U.S. military offered to rebuild one of his structures. He objected, but to little effect. Eventually he decided to leave Tarok Kolache, moving into a small homein Kandahar city, wheremany former residents of dangerous districts have relocated.

The Afghan government, for its part, hasn’t ignored the village, but redevelopm­ent efforts have been uneven. Authoritie­s built a new mosque to replace the one that was destroyed, but they did not replace the village’s school, which survived the airstrike only to be taken over by an Afghan army outpost. There are now more than a dozen children living inTarokKol­achewho have nowhere to study.

SomeAfghan proponents of the bombing now wonder what the operation’s longterm impact will be.

“We’re worried about factional tension. We fear that with the foreign troops’ departure, the locals will go at each other’s throats,” said ShahMohamm­ad, the governor of Kandahar province’s Arghandab’s district, referring to tensions between supporters and critics of the government.

Others worry that the residents of Tarok Kolache, whowere once neutral in thewar, have come to sympathize with the Taliban.

“After the bombing, they’ve become proTalib. They’re the strongest Taliban supporters in Arghandab,” said Naiz Mohammad, the district police chief.

The area’s villages are now patrolled by Afghan army and police units scattered across Arghandab. So far, they’ve held off the Taliban. But top Afghan officers say the situation could easily shift. The local terrain — the dense orchards and far-flung, highwalled mud compounds — could favor the insurgents.

For his part, Flynn remains in touch with the American soldiers who lost their limbs in this once-hostile valley to the kind of makeshift bombs that once poured out of the village. This month, he visited a family whose sonwas killed several hundred yards outside of TarokKolac­he.

Flynn said he still plans to fulfill the promise he made to the village’s residents. One day, he’ll drive there in a civilian vehicle and drink tea with the men whose homes were destroyed in the bombing of 2010.

“We’ll sit down, and we’ll talk about the bad times behind us.”

 ?? PHOTOS BY KEVIN SIEFF/THEWASHING­TON POST ?? Wakhil Ahmed, center, says he remembers looking for his bicycle after the U.S. offensive in late 2010 and finding only rubble. It was one of the most controvers­ial attacks of the war.
PHOTOS BY KEVIN SIEFF/THEWASHING­TON POST Wakhil Ahmed, center, says he remembers looking for his bicycle after the U.S. offensive in late 2010 and finding only rubble. It was one of the most controvers­ial attacks of the war.
 ??  ?? Niaz Mohammad gazes at land that was covered by Tarok Kolache’s houses before Americans bombed the village in 2010. Less than half of the village has been rebuilt since then.
Niaz Mohammad gazes at land that was covered by Tarok Kolache’s houses before Americans bombed the village in 2010. Less than half of the village has been rebuilt since then.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States