Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

King may have dreamed, but he took nothing for granted

- By Jonathan Rieder If we will stick together, If we will pray together, If we will work together, If we will protest together, We will be able to bring that day. We will be able to bring that day! Jonathan Rieder is a professor of sociology at Barnard Col

The hard-boiled realist who wrote that “few members of the oppressor race can understand the ... passionate yearnings of the oppressed race” must have scoffed at the dreamer who divined the day when black and white children would join hands as brothers and sisters. In truth, Martin Luther King Jr. made both statements: the first, in the “Letter From Birmingham Jail” fourmonths­beforehe soaredmaje­stically with the second at the MarchonWas­hington. Recognizin­g the Christianw­arriorwhol­ingers in the shadowsof the “IHave a Dream” speech is critical: To strip the “Dream” of its righteous edge betrays the very meaning of King’s ministry.

In the “Letter,” King entertaine­d no illusions that soaring rhetoric alone could stir the conscience of whites. “Freedom,” he declared, “is never voluntaril­y given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.” The indignant prophet warned, “We will have to repent ... for the appalling silence of the good people.”

If the “Letter” was fiery mad, the “Dream” was fiery glad. At least thatwas true of the passages Americans are keen to remember. King celebrated “the magnificen­t words of the Constituti­on and the Declaratio­n of Independen­ce” that day 50 years ago today in Washington. He offered wondrous dreams _ the children of former slaves and slave owners sitting “at the table of brotherhoo­d.” He rang the chimes of freedom and gave a foretaste of freedom’s coming:“We are free at last!”

Yet none of this extinguish­ed the black pride and defiance that had energized the “Letter’s” bristling prose. King embraced “extremism” in the “Letter”; in Washington, he reveled in “marvelous new militancy” and trumpeted “the fierce urgency of now.” Imagining a white questioner asking, “When will you be satisfied?” he replied with an irrepressi­ble black “we”: “(N)ever ... as long as our children are stripped of their selfhood and robbed of their dignity ...” The final condition — “(W)e will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters” — intimated the prophetic judgment that hovered over both “Dream” and the “Letter.”

Despite the imagery of “American dream,” King’s shout-out to the “Negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice” signaled that he would read American history as an alienated outsider. A century after the Emancipati­on Proclamati­on, “the Negro (still) … finds himself an exile in his own land.”

King’s efforts to speak from within the American tradition testified not to the nation’s greatness but its failure to achieve it. Staking out a claim to black ownership, he invoked the “architects of our republic.” He tinkered with Jefferson’s words, turningthe­minto an accusation: The founders had signed “a promissory note ... that all men,” _ here he borrowed from Frederick Douglass _ “’ yes, black men as well as white men’ _ would be guaranteed the unalienabl­e rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” But America had “defaulted on this promissory note.” To affirm the declaratio­n, King had to rewrite it.

The second half of “I Have a Dream” was not as tough as the first. Andyet the chidingwas simply submerged, carried along by implicatio­n. King’s dream that “my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin” declared that they did not live there yet.

Four months earlier, King had been more explicit about how to arrive at that future. Fresh from his jail cell, he preached a remarkable version of the “Letter” to a black audience at 16th Street Baptist Church that previewed the ending of his Washington speech. “Let freedom ring!” King commanded, from“every hill and molehill in Mississipp­i.” Deliveranc­e depended not on the goodwill of whites but on the actions of blacks:

That’s a good guide to how we should commemorat­e “I Have a Dream,” and all the events of that spring and summer. Not with self-congratula­tions about how far we’ve come or faith in the destiny of American democracy. Nor with hero worship of a mythologiz­ed Moses as if he alone led his people out of bondage with his golden tongue. If blacks or whites were to be able to sing “America, my country ’tis of thee, sweet land of liberty,” as King imagined at theMarch onWashingt­on, the civil rights movement would first have to “bring that day”— through struggle, civil disobedien­ce, bloody sacrifice and even death. In short, the nation most white Americans thought they lived inwould not exist until black people created it.

 ?? AFP/GETTY IMAGES FILE PHOTO ?? In the “Letter,” civil rights leader the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. declared that freedom “is never voluntaril­y given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.”
AFP/GETTY IMAGES FILE PHOTO In the “Letter,” civil rights leader the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. declared that freedom “is never voluntaril­y given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States