Bondi seeks clarity on death penalty

Supreme Court ruled in January that Florida system was unconstitutional

TALLAHASSEE — Attorney General Pam Bondi has asked the Florida Supreme Court to clarify a ruling that struck down a portion of the state’s death-penalty law, arguing that failing to do so “will only generate confusion.”

In a pair of opinions issued last Friday, the court found that a statute, passed in March in response to a U.S. Supreme Court decision, was unconstitutional “because it requires that only 10 jurors recommend death as opposed to the constitutionally required unanimous, 12-member jury.”

Bondi’s request for clarification came in the case of Larry Darnell Perry, who was convicted in the 2013 murder of his infant son. An appellate court had asked the Florida Supreme Court to decide whether the law passed in March applied to cases that were already under way.

In last Friday’s 5-2 decision in the Perry case, the court said that the law was unconstitutional because it did not require unanimous jury recommendations and “cannot be applied to pending prosecutions.”

The state contends that death penalty prosecutions can continue without a change in the law, so long as trial courts require unanimous jury recommendations to comply with last week’s ruling.

But the Supreme Court majority did not address the issue of “sever-

ability,” which would allow portions of the law that are not deficient to remain intact, Senior Assistant Attorney General Carol Dittmar wrote in the 11-page request filed Thursday.

“This omission unnecessarily invites continued litigation. The language leaves open the possibility that defense attorneys will assert that no valid death penalty law exists in Florida, demanding that trial judges strike notices of intent to pursue capital cases and refuse to impanel capital juries,” she wrote.

“This court’s finding of a constitutional flaw will only generate confusion, absent some clarification as to trial court’s authority to cure the legislative error,” she said.

But defense lawyers maintain that, a decade ago, the Supreme Court asked the Legislature to address the issue of unanimity. They say it’s now the Legislature’s job — not the court’s — to fix the law.

“It’s not clarification to ask the court to rewrite the statute,” said Martin McClain, who has represented more than 200 defendants facing the death penalty.

Like Bondi, legislative leaders and prosecutors — who pushed for 10-2 jury recommendations in deathpenalty cases over the repeated warnings of defense lawyers — contend that the statute does not have to be changed immediately for prosecutions to move forward.

The state’s death penalty has been in limbo since January, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Florida’s sentencing system was unconstitutional because it gave too much power to judges, instead of juries. Following that decision, the Florida Supreme Court indefinitely put on hold two executions, which are still pending.

Of the 31 states with the death penalty, Florida is one of just three — including Alabama and Delaware — that have not required unanimous jury recommendations for death to be imposed.

Defense lawyers repeatedly told lawmakers that Florida’s “outlier” status regarding unanimity jeopardizes the state’s death penalty because the U.S. Supreme Court considers “evolving standards of decency” when considering the issue.

A Senate proposal originally required unanimous jury recommendations, but lawmakers ultimately struck a deal — backed by Bondi and prosecutors — in which at least 10 jurors were required to favor death for the sentence to be imposed.

Incoming Senate President Joe Negron, a Stuart Republican who will take over as head of the chamber after the November elections, told The News Service of Florida this week that there was “no ambiguity” regarding the need for unanimous jury recommendations following the state Supreme Court opinions.

Negron, a lawyer, said that lawmakers could deal with the issue during next year’s 60-day legislative session, which begins in March.