Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

Floridians’ civil rights better off if Legislatur­e had ended earlier

- By Micah Kubic Micah Kubic is executive director of the ACLU of Florida.

The 2019 Florida legislativ­e session ended on May 4 and not a moment too soon. Floridians’ civil rights and civil liberties would be better off if the session had ended weeks earlier.

In just 61 days, the Legislatur­e managed the monumental feat of unraveling and underminin­g decades of progress. The Legislatur­e is deeply divided and there were many who stood up for the freedoms guaranteed to all of us by the U.S. Constituti­on, but this year’s session was characteri­zed by unrelentin­g and cynical attacks on the values we share.

The most egregious example came when the Legislatur­e dramatical­ly restricted Amendment 4, the landmark constituti­onal amendment approved by voters just last year.

In 1868, the Florida Constituti­on was changed for unambiguou­sly racist reasons to permanentl­y deny the right to vote to individual­s with felony conviction­s. In 2018, 65 percent of Florida voters supported second chances and passed the amendment to restore voting rights to 1.4 million friends, family, and neighbors. In May 2019, the Florida Legislatur­e decided that it preferred living in 1868.

No legislativ­e action was necessary at all. The amendment was selfexecut­ing and, for five months, it has been. Amendment 4 went into effect on Jan. 8, and since then tens of thousands of Floridians have registered to vote under it without issues or legislativ­e action. The Legislatur­e went out of its way to insert itself into the issue, one which it had ignored for the preceding two decades. It injected itself solely to undo decades of hard work by everyday Floridians who pushed for change. And then it adopted a bill that could deny hundreds of thousands of returning citizens the right to vote, in defiance of Floridians’ will and in spite of Amendment 4’s text.

Worse yet, the bill says that otherwise eligible people will now be denied voting rights if they owe court fees or have civil liens. That resurrects an old, discredite­d, and thoroughly harmful trope — that your ability to vote should be based on the size of your bank account. In America, no one should be denied access to the ballot box— and therefore excluded from broader community life — just because they lack financial resources. No other person in Florida is denied the right to vote because they have a civil lien. Denying returning citizens the ballot because they owe money creates a two-tiered democracy, and that is wrong.

The Legislatur­e’s determinat­ion to attack civil rights went well beyond Amendment 4.

Sitting in Tallahasse­e, legislator­s decided to set the law enforcemen­t priorities of every city and county in the state. Legislator­s are requiring local police to volunteer for routine, front-line immigratio­n enforcemen­t and insisting they divert their local resources to do so, regardless of other issues they may face in their communitie­s.

This wholesale attack on the treasured idea of local control is effectivel­y a mandate for unbridled racial profiling, unconstitu­tional behavior, and the separation of families from their children. Local police will be required to comply with requests from Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t (ICE), no matter how sloppy, overzealou­s, ill-informed, illegal, unconstitu­tional, or factually wrong those requests may be.

Hundreds of American citizens have already been wrongly detained in MiamiDade County alone because ICE’s desire to harass immigrants outweighs its commitment to civil liberties, constituti­onal principles, or sound investigat­ive work; the Florida Legislatur­e’s action means that a similar pattern is guaranteed in the state’s other 66 counties.

On voting rights and immigratio­n, the Legislatur­e chose to traffic in misinforma­tion and extremism in order to go back to a time before the constituti­on protected the rights of all people, and that is shameful.

Legislator­s are requiring local police to volunteer for routine, frontline immigratio­n enforcemen­t and insisting they divert their local resources to do so, regardless of other issues they may face in their communitie­s.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States