Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

Doctor fined for surgical abortion

- By Christine Sexton News Service of Florida

MIAMI – Alarmed by how a Broward County physician handled an abortion, a state licensing board has recommende­d that the doctor pay a fine that is more than three times what regulators had initially recommende­d.

The Florida Board of Medicine is recommendi­ng that physician Harvey Craig Roth pay a $10,000 fine and take additional courses because of performing a surgical abortion on a 35-yearold woman instead of a medication-induced abortion.

In making the recommenda­tion, the board on Friday more than tripled a $3,000 fine sought by state health attorneys, who said that amount was “in line with board precedent” for the type of error involved. The board decision isn’t final. Roth can agree to it or pursue a challenge.

The Board of Medicine, which consists largely of physicians selected by the governor, spent time during a meeting in Miami verbally sparring with Roth over whether he followed rules intended to cut down on mistakes.

One rule requires physicians to pause prior to surgery to ensure they have the right patient, the right site and are performing the right surgery. The pause must be performed again if physicians leave the room at any time during the

procedure or surgery.

But Roth, who acknowledg­ed he did not follow the pause rule, said Friday he didn’t think that affected the work he was conducting at the abortion clinic, A Woman’s Center of Hollywood. Roth works at the Broward County clinic between three and five hours a week, according to state records.

The board more than tripled the proposed fine after Roth’s concession and after board members pressed him for details on how the mistake could have occurred.

According to state documents, the patient, identified by the initials K.N.M., went to the clinic seeking the so-called “morning after” pill, which first requires women to have a sonogram. After K.N.M. checked into the clinic in December 2017 and had her vital signs taken, a medical assistant walked her to a waiting room to wait her turn for a sonogram.

Roth told board members that before performing the procedure, he had a brief conversati­on with the woman and several times used the name “Ashley” instead of her actual name. She did not correct him about the name.

Board of Medicine Vice Chairman Hector Vila grilled Roth on details surroundin­g the procedure, asking Roth whether he followed the proper informed-consent requiremen­ts in the law.

“What position was the patient in when you were doing that?” Vila, a physician from Tampa, asked Roth about the informed consent discussion.

“It was while I was doing the ultrasound,” Roth answered. “In medical terms, what position was she in?” Vila asked again.

Roth, who is certified by the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, answered, “supine.”

Roth continued, telling the board members he talked to the patient during the sonogram, asking her if she had questions.

“She said, ‘no,’” Roth said. “I told her that I was going to give her some medication. We started on IV. I gave her some sedation.”

Roth acknowledg­ed he never specifical­ly told the woman she was going to have a surgical abortion as opposed to a “medical” terminatio­n. Medical terminatio­ns can occur in the early stages of the first trimester and can be accomplish­ed by ingesting medicine.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States