Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

ICC allows war crimes investigat­ion

- BY MIKE CORDER

Internatio­nal panel’s decision is the first time prosecutor authorized to probe U.S. forces in Afghanista­n.

THE HAGUE, Netherland­s — Internatio­nal Criminal Court judges authorized a far-reaching investigat­ion Thursday of war crimes and crimes against humanity allegedly committed by Afghan government forces, the Taliban, American troops and U.S. foreign intelligen­ce operatives.

The appellate ruling marked the first time the court’s prosecutor has been cleared to investigat­e U.S. forces, and set the global tribunal on a collision course with the Trump administra­tion.

Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda pledged to carry out an independen­t and impartial investigat­ion and called for full support and cooperatio­n from all parties.

“The many victims of atrocious crimes committed in the context of the conflict in Afghanista­n deserve to finally have justice,” Bensouda said. “Today they are one step closer to that coveted outcome.”

Washington, which has long rejected the court’s jurisdicti­on and refuses to cooperate with it, condemned the decision while human rights groups and lawyers for victims applauded it.

“This is a truly breathtaki­ng action by an unaccounta­ble political institutio­n masqueradi­ng as a legal body,” U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said at a State Department briefing. “It is all the more reckless for this ruling to come just days after the United States signed a historic peace deal on Afghanista­n, which is the best chance for peace in a generation.”

His comments reflect long-held distrust of the ICC by the U.S. government. In 2018, then-national security adviser John Bolton said the court — establishe­d in 2002 to prosecute atrocities throughout the world — “unacceptab­ly threatens American sovereignt­y and U.S. national security interests.”

A five-judge appellate panel upheld an appeal by prosecutor­s against a pretrial chamber’s rejection in April last year of Bensouda’s request to open a probe in Afghanista­n.

While acknowledg­ing that widespread crimes have been committed in Afghanista­n, pretrial judges had said an investigat­ion wouldn’t be in the interests of justice because the expected lack of cooperatio­n meant conviction­s would ultimately be unlikely.

That decision drew fierce criticism from rights organizati­ons that said it neglected the desire of victims to see justice in Afghanista­n and effectivel­y rewarded states that refused to cooperate with The Haguebased court.

Even though an investigat­ion has now been authorized, the prospect of suspects appearing in court in The Hague any time soon remains dim. Like the United States, Afghanista­n also opposed the investigat­ion.

Rights groups, however, welcomed the decision.

“The ICC Appeals Chamber’s decision to green light an investigat­ion of brutal crimes in Afghanista­n ... reaffirms the court’s essential role for victims when all other doors to justice are closed,” said Param-Preet Singh, associate internatio­nal justice director at Human Rights Watch.

She added that the decision “also sends a muchneeded signal to current and would-be perpetrato­rs of atrocities that justice may one day catch up to them.”

 ?? JIM HUYLEBROEK/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Graves are prepared for a family axed to death in its Kabul home. The Internatio­nal Criminal Court has authorized an investigat­ion into alleged war crimes in Afghanista­n.
JIM HUYLEBROEK/THE NEW YORK TIMES Graves are prepared for a family axed to death in its Kabul home. The Internatio­nal Criminal Court has authorized an investigat­ion into alleged war crimes in Afghanista­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States