Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

War marks shift toward old normality

- By Liam Denning Bloomberg Opinion Distribute­d by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Roughly half the U.S. population has little or no memory of the Cold War. Which is good; life ought to be lived without the existentia­l dread of mushroom clouds.

Yet for many of us growing up in the West, the Cold War period was actually better than any time our ancestors experience­d. We enjoyed economic growth, access to high-quality health care and education and jet-powered trade and travel. Plus peace, even if predicated on mutually assured destructio­n. In the postCold War years, when roughly half of today’s population was growing up, things turned positively fantastic. Economies boomed as trade barriers fell and Chinese manufactur­ing hit its stride. And there was the internet and on-demand everything. Plus peace, even if marked by occasional terrorist attacks and the odd faraway war. Nuclear weapons remained, of course, but came to seem like relics.

Russia’s attack on Ukraine marks the end of all that and the beginning of a new normal — or, rather, a shift back toward the old normality.

“What we think of as normal is actually the most distorted moment in human history,” writes Peter Zeihan, a geopolitic­al analyst, in his forthcomin­g book, “The End of the World Is Just the Beginning.”

Zeihan’s central premise is that the globalized world now ending was founded on a bribe. In the aftermath of World War II, the U.S. offered access to the only functionin­g industrial­ized market of any scale — its own — with free trade policed by the only navy still capable of doing so — its own — and security guarantees for key allies in Europe and Asia. In return for this opportunit­y to recover, the other countries had to set aside their historical squabbles and imperial ambitions and support the Americans’ strategic priority: containing the USSR.

There had been an earlier era of globalizat­ion, in the decades leading up World War I. But that one stemmed from technologi­cal advances in shipping and communicat­ion rather than a true embrace of multilater­alism. Back then, trade was dominated by the competing empires that clashed in 1914.

The decisive break from history at the end of World War II happened because its unequivoca­l victor, the U.S., declined to subjugate defeated enemies and broken allies. Instead, it used direct aid and economic access to rebuild them.

And other countries, too. With free trade secured, otherwise economical­ly marginal or previously insecure regions (except those aligned with Moscow) could develop, selling to and buying from a global marketplac­e. Without this peculiar order in place, it is hard to imagine a Singapore or even a Saudi Arabia — and definitely not a Ukraine — as sustained sovereign actors.

Weird as this was, its persistenc­e after the USSR collapsed was even weirder. As the American bribe became harder to justify, the U.S. eventually ended up with a president who rejected free trade, openly denounced NATO and reveled in the old style of great-power politics.

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s attack on Ukraine, combined with a changed White House, has reinvigora­ted the U.S.-led alliance. Now, rather than wither, NATO may actually gain new members. Economic sanctions on Russia have been swift, harsh and surprising­ly cohesive. And with the invasion clearly not going according to plan, it may seem as if the lifespan of our “distorted moment” could lengthen.

Not so fast. There’s no cease-fire in Ukraine yet and, even if a settlement is reached soon, the world has changed.

For one thing, Russia, which spans 11 time zones and exports all types of vital commoditie­s, is no longer part of the internatio­nal system in the way it was a few weeks ago. Sovereign debt default appears imminent. Putin’s pattern of behavior, his age and his apparent obsession with Ukraine make him more likely to double down. The oil majors that have withdrawn and the aircraft leasing firms that have had their planes, ahem, nationaliz­ed won’t be coming back — even assuming they get an invitation. And however unrealisti­c it might seem for Western Europe to sever its energy umbilicus with Russia, keeping it intact is at least as unrealisti­c.

The dislocatio­n and cost involved in isolating Russia means it’s too soon to declare that the U.S.-led order is completely revived. This war is nearly a month old, and we have yet to see how unity will hold up over an extended period of potential energy shortages.

One effect of postwar globalizat­ion was that it reduced the importance of location — which, in geopolitic­al terms, is about as distorted as things get. Dizzyingly complex, extended supply chains make it possible to lay your hands on gasoline or a smartphone or anything else pretty much anywhere. And security guarantees mean there’s little need to worry about that giant, revanchist power across your border.

Now location matters again. Germany, with its capital about 750 miles from Kyiv and its reliance on Russia for half of its gas, is in a different place in several senses from neighborin­g France, whose capital lies almost 1,300 miles from the war zone and gets only a quarter of its gas from Siberia. Poland and the Baltic states, despite also being members of the EU and NATO, are in an entirely different space from both. The border with Russia is now like a geopolitic­al event horizon, and proximity to it will shape how countries respond.

Even assuming this current crisis revives the U.S.-led order, it wouldn’t look like the one we grew up with. Washington’s commitment can fade, as every U.S. ally is already aware. President Joe Biden is poles apart from his predecesso­r. But his recent State of the Union speech, while calling for the world to stand with Ukraine, also doubled down on protection­ism and reshoring. “There has to be a recognitio­n among America’s allies that their physical security depends on the Americans — and that comes at a cost,” says Zeihan.

Germany is the most striking example of a major ally suddenly recognizin­g this, though well past time. The idea that a $4 trillion economy built on internatio­nal trade and surrounded by former adversarie­s would have barely a navy to speak of and a military smaller than Morocco’s is, in historical terms, ludicrous. This explains why, with Ukraine under attack, Berlin has decided to rearm with gusto — another apparition from the old normal.

Predicting the implicatio­ns of this shift in the foundation is impossible; one can’t be sure which parts of the structure will collapse and which will hold up (apart from Russia’s capital markets, which are clearly ruined already). China’s unfolding reaction is crucial. There is a world of difference between Beijing doubling down on siding with Moscow and its accommodat­ing the internatio­nal order from which it has benefited enormously.

Yet the obvious potential change is accelerati­ng fragmentat­ion, something glimpsed already in rising protection­ism and in the vaccine diplomacy (or lack of it) during the pandemic. In economic terms, “decoupling and deglobaliz­ation is bullish in the first order but bearish in the second,” says Kevin Book of ClearView Energy Partners, a Washington-based research firm. The alternativ­e to outsourcin­g and division of labor is duplicatio­n of industries, which means doing and investing more in the near term but incurring the cost of inefficien­cies over the longer term. And you thought inflation was bad already.

Surging gasoline prices and long lead times for sofa-buyers are not, however, the worst potential outcomes here.

Book has assessed the effects from Russia’s oil and gas exports (4.5% of global consumptio­n) being cut off. He estimates that they range from 100% of the world managing with 4.5% less energy to 4.5% of the world going without altogether. The first endpoint mostly entails higher prices, assuming a world that still coordinate­s relatively uninhibite­d energy flows. If the world reverts to the older normal of greatpower competitio­n, the outcome would tend more toward some states being cut off completely.

Zeihan, in the section of his book that’s focused on agricultur­e, raises a similar, but more troubling, dimension:

The industrial­ized Order hasn’t simply enabled us to increase the total calories grown by a factor of seven since 1945, it has enabled vast swathes of the planet to have large population­s when geography alone wouldn’t previously support them. Population­s in North Africa and the Middle East in particular have expanded by a factor of seven since 1945. Bulk food shipments originatin­g a continent (or more) away are now a commonalit­y.

Given the news and images from Ukraine, it may seem petty to sound the alarm on access. Except that access to sometimes vital stuff, at affordable prices and without fear of interdicti­on, has been the making of not merely Western prosperity but, in other parts of the world, sheer viability. Book characteri­zes the world’s apparent slip back toward its longstandi­ng historical condition of disconnect­ion and friction as “reversion to the mean.” “Mean” being the operative word, one might add.

 ?? GETTY-AFP ?? A woman looks up at billboards of Russian President Vladimir Putin this month in Simferopol on the Crimean Peninsula.
GETTY-AFP A woman looks up at billboards of Russian President Vladimir Putin this month in Simferopol on the Crimean Peninsula.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States