Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

EPA details $27B ‘green bank’ to fund clean energy projects

- By Matthew Daly

WASHINGTON — The Biden administra­tion has announced how states and nonprofit groups can apply for $27 billion in funding from a “green bank” that will provide low-cost financing for projects intended to cut planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions.

The so-called Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, created by Congress in the landmark climate law approved last year, will invest in clean energy projects nationwide, with a focus on low-income and disadvanta­ged communitie­s.

The Environmen­tal Protection Agency expects to award $20 billion in competitiv­e grants to as many 15 nonprofit groups that will work with local banks and other financial institutio­ns to invest in projects that reduce pollution and lower energy costs for families.

Another $7 billion will be awarded to states, tribes and municipali­ties to deploy a range of solar energy projects, including residentia­l rooftop solar, community solar and solar storage.

EPA Administra­tor Michael Regan said the green bank — modeled after similar banks establishe­d in states such as Connecticu­t, New York and California — will unlock billions of dollars in private investment to enable neighborho­ods and communitie­s “that have never participat­ed in the clean-energy economy to participat­e in full force” in creating green jobs.

Low-income and disadvanta­ged communitie­s “who pay the largest percent of their income toward energy bills have been left out of the investment game (and) have not seen the infusion of private capital to help them realize opportunit­ies ... for lots of reasons,” Regan said Tuesday.

The program expects to begin making grant awards this summer and has already received nearly 400 responses to preliminar­y inquiries, said Jahi Wise, the program’s acting director.

Even before the grants are awarded, Republican­s in Congress have called the green bank ripe for abuse.

Rep. Gary Palmer, R-Ala., said he will sponsor a bill to repeal the fund, which he said will likely benefit Wall Street firms but “doesn’t help the American people with their utility bills.

“Will this $27 billion slush fund lower the cost of heating for these American families?” Palmer asked.

Sean Kelly, a spokesman for House Energy and Commerce Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., said the fund “allocates an incredible amount of authority and resources” to the EPA, yet lacks measures to ensure accountabi­lity or transparen­cy in how the resources are used.

Democrats were more optimistic, calling the fund a historic opportunit­y to cut greenhouse gas emissions, protect public health and create economic opportunit­y in disadvanta­ged and under-resourced communitie­s.

“For years, we’ve fought to take the idea of a national climate bank from a vision to a reality. With today’s action from the EPA, we’re one step closer,” said Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., who pushed for the green bank along with Massachuse­tts Sen. Ed Markey and other Democrats.

 ?? ANNA MONEYMAKER/GETTY 2022 ?? EPA Administra­tor Michael Regan said the green bank is modeled after similar ones found in states such as Connecticu­t, New York and California.
ANNA MONEYMAKER/GETTY 2022 EPA Administra­tor Michael Regan said the green bank is modeled after similar ones found in states such as Connecticu­t, New York and California.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States