Sweetwater Reporter

Trump lawyers meet with Justice Dept. officials as charging decision nears in Mar-a-Lago case

-

WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawyers for Donald Trump met with Justice Department officials on Monday as a decision nears on whether to bring criminal charges over the handling of classified documents at the former president’s Florida estate.

The Trump lawyers two weeks ago requested a meeting with Attorney General Merrick Garland to raise concerns about what they alleged was prosecutor­ial misconduct and overreach by the team led by special counsel Jack Smith. But a defense attorney meeting with Justice Department officials is also often used as an opportunit­y to try to persuade prosecutor­s against bringing charges in the final stages of an investigat­ion. It was not clear what was discussed during the meeting, but Trump, in a social media post and talk radio interview, signaled that he was prepared for the possibilit­y that he would be charged and reiterated his attacks on the investigat­ion. A trio of Trump attorneys — James Trusty, John Rowley and Lindsey Halligan — exited the Justice Department headquarte­rs in Washington on Monday morning after spending well over an hour inside. They got into a black sport utility vehicle and did not respond to reporters’ questions.

Garland and Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco were not present for the meeting but special counsel Jack Smith was. The Justice Department had no comment on the meeting.

After the meeting ended, Trump posted on his Truth Social platform in capital letters: “How can DOJ possibly charge me, who did nothing wrong” when no other presidents have been charged. He referenced the investigat­ion into his 2016 opponent Hillary Clinton, which ended without criminal charges, and a separate ongoing probe into the presence of classified documents at an office and home of President Joe Biden. And he characteri­zed it as a “witch hunt.”

He also called into the Todd Starnes radio show, where he confirmed the meeting with his lawyers and said, “Well, I can just say this: They did go in and they saw ’em and they said very unfair. No other president has ever been charged with anything like his.’”

The Trump investigat­ion differs from both the Biden and Clinton probes, though, in that prosecutor­s for months have examined whether Trump or his representa­tives sought to obstruct their inquiry and their efforts to recover classified documents. After suspecting that not all classified documents had been turned over, the FBI in August obtained a search warrant and returned to Mar-a-Lago and recovered an additional 100 documents with classifica­tion markings. The Mar-a-Lago investigat­ion into the potential mishandlin­g of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, with a charging decision likely coming soon. Prosecutor­s have placed a broad cross-section of witnesses, including lawyers for Trump and close aides, before a grand jury.

Trump’s lawyers issued a letter to House lawmakers in April that laid out possible defenses and referred to the investigat­ion as “misguided, politicall­y infected, and severely botched.”

Besides the Mar-a-Lago investigat­ion, Smith is leading a separate probe into efforts by Trump and his allies to undo the results of the 2020 presidenti­al election.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States