Sweetwater Reporter

EPA sets out rules for proposed ‘methane fee’ for waste generated by oil and natural gas companies

-

WASHINGTON (AP) — Oil and natural gas companies for the first time would have to pay a fee for methane emissions that exceed certain levels under a rule proposed Friday by the Biden administra­tion.

The proposed Environmen­tal Protection Agency rule follows through on a directive from Congress included in the 2022 climate law. The new fee is intended to encourage industry to adopt best practices that reduce emissions of methane and thereby avoid paying.

Methane is a climate “super pollutant” that is more potent in the short term than carbon dioxide and is responsibl­e for about one-third of greenhouse gas emissions. The oil and natural gas sector is the largest industrial source of methane emissions in the United States, and advocates say reduction of methane emissions is an important way to slow climate change.

Excess methane produced this year would result in a fee of $900 per ton, with fees rising to $1,500 per ton by 2026.

EPA Administra­tor Michael Regan said the proposed fee would work in tandem with a final rule on methane emissions EPA announced last month. The fee, formally known as the Methane Emissions Reduction Program, will encourage early deployment of available technologi­es to reduce methane emissions and other harmful air pollutants before the new standards take effect, he said.

The rule announced in December includes a twoyear phase-in period for companies to eliminate routine flaring of natural gas from new oil wells.

“EPA is delivering on a comprehens­ive strategy to reduce wasteful methane emissions that endanger communitie­s and fuel the climate crisis,” Regan said in a statement. When finalized later this year, the proposed methane fee will set technology standards that will “incentiviz­e industry innovation’’ and spur action to reduce pollution, he said.

Leading oil and gas companies already meet or exceed performanc­e levels set by Congress under the climate law, meaning they will not have to pay the proposed fee, Regan and other officials said.

Sen. Tom Carper, chairman of the Senate Environmen­t and Public Works Committee, said he was pleased the administra­tion was moving forward with the methane fee as directed by Congress.

“We know methane is over 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide at trapping heat in our atmosphere in the short term,’’ said Carper, D-Del. He said the program “will incentiviz­e producers to cut wasteful and excessive methane emissions during oil and gas production.”

New Jersey Rep. Frank Pallone, the top Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said oil and gas companies have long calculated that it’s cheaper to waste methane through flaring and other techniques than to make necessary upgrades to prevent leaks.

“Wasted methane never makes its way to consumers, but they are neverthele­ss stuck with the bill,” Pallone said. The proposed methane fee “will ensure consumers no longer pay for wasted energy or the harm its emissions can cause.’’

Republican­s call the methane fee a tax that could raise prices on natural gas.

Fred Krupp, president of the Environmen­tal Defense Fund, called the proposed fee “common sense,’’ adding that oil and gas companies should be held accountabl­e for methane pollution, a primary source of global warming.

In a related developmen­t, EPA said it is working with industry and others to improve how methane emissions are reported, citing numerous studies showing that and oil and gas companies have significan­tly underrepor­ted their methane emissions to the EPA under the agency’s Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program.

The climate law, formally known as the Inflation Reduction Act, establishe­d a waste-emissions charge for methane from oil and gas facilities that report emissions of more than 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year to the EPA. The proposal announced Friday sets out details of how the fee will be implemente­d, including how exemptions will be applied.

The agency said it expects that over time, fewer oil and gas sites will be charged as they reduce their emissions in compliance with the rule.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States