Biden Impeachment Inquiry Winds Down
(continued from Page 3) It would be rare but not unprecedented for a president to appear before Congress. Abraham Lincoln spoke privately to the House Judiciary Committee about a leaked speech and Gerald Ford appeared about his pardon of former president Richard M. Nixon, among others.
Aboard Air Force One as Biden flew Wednesday from Arizona to Texas, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said, “Republicans need to drop this stunt and join the president in focusing on real issues that matter to the American people.” Wednesday’s testimony came from a cast of unusual witnesses, some with complicated backgrounds. Jason Galanis is serving a lengthy federal prison sentence in Alabama for fraud schemes and appeared remotely before lawmakers. Tony Bobulinski, a onetime business associate of Hunter Biden, took his claims against the family public during the first Trump-Biden presidential debate in 2020.
The Democrats called Lev Parnas to testify, relying on the convicted businessman who was central to Trump’s first impeachment as a Rudy Giuliani associate working to dig up political dirt on Joe Biden before the 2020 election.
Parnas has since played a key role in dispelling the House GOP’s main claim of bribery against the Bidens.
Testifying via video, Galanis told lawmakers he expected to make “billions” with Hunter Biden and other associates, using the Biden family name in their foreign business dealings.
Galanis described a particular time in May 2014 when Hunter Biden put his father on speakerphone for a brief chat with potential foreign business partners — a Russian oligarch and her husband — during a party at a New York restaurant.
But Hunter Biden directly rebuffed involvement with Galanis in his own deposition, testifying that he met Galanis for about 30 minutes 10 years ago. In earlier testimony, Galanis, who was sentenced for multiple fraud schemes, acknowledged that he unsuccessfully sought a pardon in the final days of the Trump presidency.
Bobulinski told the committee that he met twice with Joe Biden in 2017 during a conference in Los Angeles, through Hunter Biden, including once for about 45 minutes, when they talked mostly about family and did not talk business.
While Hunter Biden has testified that his father was never involved in his business dealings, Bobulinski declared: “It is clear to me that Joe Biden was the brand.”
Parnas told the committee that he has seen “zero evidence” of Biden family corruption in his work overseas.
Before his conviction, Parnas had been a central figure in Trump’s first impeachment over withholding aid to Ukraine. Parnas described helping Giuliani peddle the false claims against Biden to conservative media. Trump’s team claimed that Joe Biden, as vice president, had intervened in the firing of a Ukrainian prosecutor to aid Hunter Biden’s work on the board of the Ukrainian energy firm Burisma. In fact, Western allies also wanted the prosecutor fired over allegations of corruption. In launching their Biden impeachment inquiry last year, the House Republicans relied in large part on unverified claims from an FBI informant released by Senate Republicans suggesting Burisma-related payments totaling $10 million to the Bidens were discussed. The now former FBI informant, Alexander Smirnov, was arrested last month and pleaded not guilty to charges that he fabricated the bribery allegations. Rep. Alexandria OcasioCortez, D-N.Y., asked the Republicans why kept pursuing impeachment knowing the $10 million claim is false and she demanded to know what crime or crimes they allege Biden, as president, has committed to warrant impeachment. “Impeachment 101,” she said. “I’m hearing about Biden’s family. I’m hearing about this and that. I am not hearing the specific allegation.”
One Democrat, Rep. Jared Moskowitz of Florida, all but dared Republicans to start impeachment proceedings, making the motion himself. It went nowhere.
“They’re never going to impeach Joe Biden,” Moskowitz declared. “It’s all a sham.”
With the House’s slim GOP majority narrowed further by early retirements, Republicans may not have enough support within their ranks to pursue articles of impeachment against the president, especially because Democrats would likely vote against any such charges.
Instead, Comer has been looking into potential criminal referrals that could open the door to prosecutions in a future administration.
It’s unclear who would exactly be charged, and over what offenses. Comer has also discussed drafting ethics-related legislation to tighten influence peddling or foreign lobbying among officials.
The committee will issue a final report with its recommendations once the inquiry has concluded.