Texarkana Gazette

Rhode Islanders gush about state’s paid family leave

- By Jennifer McDermott

PROVIDENCE, R.I .— As President Barack Obama pushes for a federal law to get paid leave to care for a new baby or an ailing relative, residents of one of the three states that already provide it sing its praises, hinting at the reception it could receive if rolled out nationally.

Rhode Island last year began allowing workers to take up to four weeks of paid leave. Many workers say they love the program, and employers say it hasn’t hurt business as some had feared.

Anne Quirk, of Providence, had planned to take three months of unpaid leave from her job as a speech language pathologis­t after she gave birth. But she needed five months off after her doctor ordered her on bedrest on Mother’s Day last year; then, her son was born prematurel­y in June.

“It was just such a stress reliever, knowing there was going to be money to help us pay the bills,” said Quirk, who gushed about the program to Obama when he visited Rhode Island in October. “I don’t know what we would’ve done without it.”

About 5,000 people have taken paid family leave in Rhode Island so far. New Jersey and California are the other states that provide it, and several states are considerin­g it. Washington state passed legislatio­n but has put off implementi­ng it.

The United States is the only industrial­ized nation that doesn’t mandate paid leave for mothers of newborns. Obama wants Congress to allocate more than $2 billion to help states create paid family and medical leave programs, and he wants to provide federal workers with additional paid leave.

Rhode Island has a long-standing program that pays a portion of an employee’s salary when he or she is unable to work because of illness or injury. The temporary caregiver insurance program was folded into that existing program to compensate workers who leave their jobs temporaril­y to care for a relative or bond with a new baby.

Workers pay for both through a payroll deduction. The benefit for family leave amounts to about 60 percent of an employee’s regular paycheck, capped at $770 per week. Employees received a total of $6.3 million in payments in 2014.

Not every worker can get the benefit. Some haven’t paid enough into the system, and public-sector employees don’t pay for the insurance.

Obama said during the October visit that Rhode Island “has got the right idea” and that the nation needs to broaden its laws for family leave.

Democrats haven’t been able to garner enough support for a bill in Congress to allow workers to earn up to seven days of paid sick leave to care for themselves or a sick relative, obtain preventive care or treat domestic violence. Opponents generally say requiring paid leave could burden businesses in lost hours and temporary hires or extra work needed to cover workers on leave.

Senate Republican­s, including Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, have proposed allowing voluntary arrangemen­ts where private-sector workers put the overtime they earn toward paid leave rather than extra compensati­on, an alternativ­e to the Democrats’ approach.

In Rhode Island, Republican state Rep. Brian Newberry said he thinks the state’s paid family leave bill is one of the worst pieces of legislatio­n passed in his seven years in the House. It hurts businesses and imposes a tax on many people who never use it, said Newberry, the House minority leader. He thinks the insurance should be privatized.

Legislator­s are considerin­g allowing employees covered by disability insurance through their employers to opt out of the state program.

“The disruption to a business when a key person leaves for that length of time is immense,” Newberry said.

Republican state Sen. Christophe­r Scott Ottiano also opposed the bill out of fear it would be onerous for businesses, but he said his thinking is “evolving.” Ottiano, a doctor, has seen how the program has helped many of his patients.

Rhode Island businesses say it has barely made a ripple.

The Rhode Island Department of Labor and Training said it has heard no concerns from small businesses since the rollout.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States