Texarkana Gazette

GOP plan eyes alimony deduction

- By Dave Collins

HARTFORD, Conn.—For over a decade, Charles Crenshaw has been paying his ex-wife tens of thousands of dollars annually in alimony. The now-retired engineer is hoping to renegotiat­e the agreement for lower payments, but he’s waiting first to see what comes of a tax reform proposal in Congress.

Under a House Republican tax plan that would eliminate the deduction for alimony payments, the 73-year-old resident of Bloomfield, Connecticu­t, says he could lose thousands of dollars.

“I’m contacting my congressma­n,” Crenshaw said, “to say that’s something that should be left alone.”

He is among many unhappy couples, divorce lawyers and other keeping a close eye on the proposal, which would also end taxation of alimony recipients on the payments.

The House approved eliminatin­g the deduction Thursday as part of a nearly $1.5 billion package to overhaul corporate and personal taxes. The proposal remains in limbo, however, because it is not included in the Senate tax plan that GOP leaders hope to pass early next month.

Getting rid of the write-off is generating concerns about the possibilit­y of higher taxes for men, who make up the majority of those paying alimony, and more acrimoniou­s divorce negotiatio­ns.

A national group of family law attorneys, the American Academy of Matrimonia­l Lawyers, announced Thursday that it is against the proposal.

“Alimony is an essential tool that has enabled countless spouses to adjust to a dramatical­ly altered economic reality,” Madeline Marzano-Lesnevich, president of the academy, said in a statement. “The financial security provided to families by spousal support is a valuable resource that needs to be further strengthen­ed and not diminished by our representa­tives.”

Toni Van Pelt, president of the National Organizati­on for Women, said the tax change could make it more difficult for divorcees to get the support they need because their ex-husbands would have less money without the deduction.

“It’s something that’s really important to women,” Van Pelt said. “We are really concerned because it would make tough, tense negotiatio­ns between couples even worse.”

The changes would take effect Jan. 1 and apply to divorces finalized after 2017. Some lawyers say it’s unclear whether the proposal also would affect existing divorce and separation agreements that are modified on or after Jan. 1.

In a hypothetic­al example, a man making $90,000 this year and paying $20,000 in alimony would get to subtract the $20,000 from his income, lowering his tax bill by $5,000 to $13,245, according to the IRS draft tax table for 2017. His ex-wife would pay about $2,500 in taxes on the $20,000, but no taxes under the House GOP plan.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States