Texarkana Gazette

Republican­s set to move past Russia

- By Mary Clare Jalonick

WA S H INGTON— Republican­s and Democrats are scrambling in the final days of 2017 to establish an enduring narrative on multiple Russia investigat­ions and the integrity of the investigat­ors, a partisan messaging battle that has intensifie­d as special counsel Robert Mueller has appeared to focus more intently on President Donald Trump and his inner circle.

Congressio­nal Republican­s who have put up with almost a year’s worth of speculatio­n and investigat­ions into Trump’s ties to Russia are hoping to move on from that topic in 2018, renewing focus on Democrat Hillary Clinton and stepping up criticism of Mueller. Democrats remain focused on Trump and are pushing to keep congressio­nal investigat­ions on Russia going for months to come.

On Thursday, Republican­s brought the topic back to Clinton as two committees began conducting interviews in a new investigat­ion of the FBI and its 2016 inquiry into Clinton’s email server. The House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform committees spent hours behind closed doors with Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, who was involved in that probe. It was the second time this week McCabe has met with lawmakers behind closed doors as Republican­s charge that there is anti-Trump bias within the ranks of the bureau.

Democrats are accusing the GOP of diversiona­ry tactics and say their criticism could embolden Trump to take steps to fire Mueller.

“This is a fight for the soul of our democracy,” said Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings, the top Democrat on the oversight panel, on Thursday. “Nothing less.”

Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee, made a speech Wednesday on the Senate floor warning Trump not to take any action relating to Mueller. He said Thursday that he gave the speech because the “tone and tenor” coming from the White House and its allies “should send a chill through all of us.”

Trump and White House officials have insisted in recent weeks that the president has no intention of firing Mueller, a decision that would likely be up to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who appointed the special counsel. That is a change from earlier this year, when the president was openly critical of him.

Some Republican­s charge that Democrats’ pushback is disingenuo­us, given Trump’s recent words.

“I think it’s a lot of posturing and I think it’s a lot of trying to scare people that the boogeyman is out there and he’s certainly going to come get us when that doesn’t seem to be the focus at all from the White House,” said Oklahoma Sen. James Lankford, a member of the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee.

Like many Republican­s, Lankford said he doesn’t think Mueller should be removed, though he says he has concerns about bias at the FBI since hundreds of text messages were revealed between an FBI counterint­elligence agent and an FBI lawyer criticizin­g Trump. Both had been assigned to Mueller’s investigat­ion, which has already resulted in charges against four of his campaign advisers and increasing­ly appears focused on Trump’s inner circle of associates and advisers.

Both the House and Senate intelligen­ce panels have spent most of the year investigat­ing Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 elections and whether Trump’s campaign in any way colluded with the Russians. While the mostly bipartisan Senate probe is expected to continue well into 2018, House Republican­s are conducting some of their final interviews this week and are hoping to release a report early next year.

Democrats charge that Republican­s are rushing the conclusion of the House investigat­ion, saying there are more witnesses to see and documents to obtain. California Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the intelligen­ce panel, has compared the investigat­ion to the GOP-led probe of the 2012 Benghazi attacks, which killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans. That investigat­ion, which centered on then-Secretary of State Clinton, lasted more than two years.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States