Texarkana Gazette

Thwarting the push to make inflation permanent


Just weeks after the Biden administra­tion declared victory over inflation, prices are rising again. January’s inflation rate was much higher than anticipate­d, while the Bureau of Labor Statistics quietly doubled fourth-quarter inflation estimates. Of course, regular Americans don’t need government revisions to know that prices keep rising, especially for necessitie­s like food and gasoline.

Yet amid the chaos, leftwing academics are pushing a radical experiment to make inflation permanent. They should be firmly rejected.

Ever since government­s got into the business of centrally planning economies, they’ve turned to one fallacy above all: that government­s should print as much money as politician­s want and just leave regular people to deal with the inflation.

Today, this fallacy is making a comeback among leftwing radicals who bill their permanent inflation “Modern Money Theory” (MMT).

The idea in MMT is that the government can take as much as it wants by simply printing money, because government dollars will magically grow the economy and any resulting inflation can be magicked away by taxing the people into oblivion.

This means the federal government can spend endless trillions on Green New Deals, mass welfare, crony capitalism or any new utopias that come bouncing down the pike. All those trillions would be on top of our current deficit running over $8.3 trillion over the past four years — levels not seen since the World Wars.

Who pays for all those fresh dollars? Why, you do: The new dollars compete with the old dollars you’ve spent a lifetime earning, diluting them like pouring water into wine. MMT at core is an inflation tax: Your bank account, your salary, your pension all melt before your eyes, but by gum, we’ll finally put a windmill on every house to admire from our green-approved bullet trains to nowhere.

Beyond the injustice of robbing you to fund leftwing utopias, permanent inflation punishes savers and investors alike. It drives our national savings rate toward zero, chases American factories and even small business overseas, and starves America of the investment capital needed to sustain national prosperity and a bright future for our children. All while eroding the dollar’s precarious position as global reserve currency, sapping our nation’s power and dominance in the world.

Finally, like an addictive drug, once high inflation is started it needs to keep going higher. Meaning the final destinatio­n of MMT-style inflationi­sm is to plunge our economy and our society into the kind of social strife, collapse in trust, and economic chaos that we’ve seen in inflationa­ry regimes from Argentina to Venezuela to Zimbabwe.

Commenters have been frank. Economist John Cochrane wrote, “Skeptics have called it ‘magical monetary theory. They’re right.” AEI’s Michael Strain pronounced MMT “a joke that’s not funny… lunacy.” George Selgin has called MMT “tantalizin­g, but false.” Third Way’s Zach Moller noted MMT would “destroy foreign confidence in America’s finances.”

Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers has written “this approach leads to hyperinfla­tion.” Even Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, no free-market radical, has called MMT-style debt monetizati­on “a wrong-headed theory” that leads to “hyper-inflation.”

To put an end to the MMT cult, Sen. Mike Braun, R-Ind., plans to introduce a resolution that would state the duty of the Senate to reject MMT and the inflation and endless deficits it promotes. It’s an excellent start: Congress needs to make it clear that the role of the federal government is to protect and help the American people, not to use them to fund whatever utopian fantasy seized left-wing radicals this week.

Beyond rejecting MMT, we hope Congress will push further reforms to end the inflation coming from Washington. This includes limiting government spending, ending crony or outdated regulation­s that punish producers and job-creators, and committing to support prudent and time-tested policies over the wild experiment­s of radical academics.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States