Texarkana Gazette

Report again highlights the need for entitlemen­t reform

- Las Vegas Review-journal.

Neither of the two presumptiv­e major party presidenti­al nominees wants to seriously discuss Social Security. But political cowardice is no substitute for statesmans­hip. The longer Congress does nothing, the worse the problem gets for retirees and those nearing retirement.

On Monday, the Social Security trustees released their annual report on the fiscal state of the program. The news could have been worse, but it wasn’t good. Absent reform, recipients will see benefit cuts beginning in 2035. That’s a one-year improvemen­t from last year’s analysis, but the looming cliff remains in view.

The report on Medicare was a bit better. The government health-care program for the elderly is now expected to remain solvent until 2036, five years later than was projected last year.

Simply put, however, these programs aren’t sustainabl­e long term without congressio­nal action. Without that, Social Security will be able to deliver only 83 percent of promised benefits in 11 years, while a dozen years from now Medicare will have the funds to cover just 89 percent of Part A benefits.

But President Joe Biden, his likely Republican opponent Donald Trump and most members of Congress have no interest diving into the deep end of the entitlemen­t debate for fear of angering seniors, who tend to vote. Yet paralysis has consequenc­es and will make it more difficult to phase in any fixes.

Trump insists vaguely that he will “protect” Social Security and Medicare. Biden has not yet presented a specific proposal, but he has implied that raising taxes on high earners might shore up Social Security.

Yet tax increases alone won’t address the structural problems. Social Security was created as a generation­al transfer program. As the American population ages, fewer and fewer workers now must cover the benefits of more retirees, leading to fiscal challenges regardless of tax hikes. Further decoupling contributi­ons from benefits for high-income workers also risks eroding political support for the program.

Other proposals include raising the retirement age and slowing benefit increases.

It’s worth noting that reforms likely would not fall on seniors who are currently collecting benefit checks or those within a few years of retirement. That would be an undue burden on those with minimal financial flexibilit­y.

Biden and Trump have an obligation to present voters this fall with detailed plans on what they would do in their lame-duck terms to address the entitlemen­t crisis.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States