The Arizona Republic

NATION & WORLD

- By Stephen Ohlemacher Associated Press

‘Fiscal cliff’ stopgap sought: With time running out to strike a major deal with Republican­s, President Obama calls for a scaled-back, shortterm solution to the “fiscal cliff.”

WASHINGTON — Workers probably won’t feel the full brunt of next year’s tax increases in their January paychecks, but they shouldn’t be fooled by the temporary reprieve.

No matter what Congress does to address the yearend fiscal cliff, it’s already too late for employers to accurately withhold income taxes from January paychecks, unless all the current tax rates remain unchanged, which is an unlikely scenario.

Social Security payroll taxes are set to increase Jan. 1, so workers should immediatel­y feel the squeeze of a 2 percent cut in their take-home pay. But as talks drag on over how to address other year-end tax increases, the Internal Revenue Service has delayed releasing income tax withholdin­g tables for 2013.

As a result, employers are planning to withhold income taxes at the 2012 rates, at least for the first one or two paychecks of the year, said Michael O’Toole of the American Payroll Associatio­n.

Making it up later

If employers don’t withhold enough taxes in January, they will have to withhold even more taxes later in the year to make up the difference. Otherwise, taxpayers could get hit with big tax bills, and possibly penalties, when they file their 2013 returns.

The tax increases could be steep. If Congress fails to act, workers at every income level face significan­t tax increases next year.

A taxpayer making between $50,000 and $75,000 would get an average tax increase of $2,400, according to the Tax Policy Center, a Washington research group. If the worker is paid every two weeks, that’s about $92 a paycheck, on average.

Someone making between $75,000 and $100,000 would get a tax increase averaging nearly $3,700. If the worker is paid every two weeks, that’s about $142 a paycheck.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States