The Arizona Republic

Law provides guidelines on what former employers may disclose

- JOHN J. BALITIS FENNEMORE CRAIG — Compiled by Georgann Yara Have a question? Send it to Ask the Experts, The Arizona Republic, 200 E. Van Buren St., NM19, Phoenix, AZ 85004. E-mail askthe experts1@gmail.com or fax 602-444-8044.

What kind of informatio­n is a former employer allowed to reveal to a prospectiv­e employer? After an interview process with a potential employer, the company practicall­y guaranteed me getting hired. But later, the HR person called and told me that they were not going to hire me and indicated the decision was made after contacting my previous employer — with whom I had personal difference­s that led to my departure. I have not committed any illegal act and my performanc­e reviews have been positive. Can my former bosses ruin my chances of getting hired by personally criticizin­g me to other companies?

Arizona’s blacklisti­ng statute regulates what informatio­n employers may disclose about employees and former employees.

Under the statute, certain employers are immune from liability for communicat­ing to prospectiv­e employers, in good faith, truthful informatio­n about a former employee’s education, training, experience, qualificat­ions and job performanc­e. They also are immune from liability for disclosing, in good faith, the reason for terminatin­g a former employee, as well as his or her profession­al conduct or evaluation­s. These disclosure­s are presumed to be in good faith if the disclosing employer has less than 100 workers or, if larger, has a regular practice of making such disclosure­s.

The presumptio­n of good faith in the statute is rebuttable by showing that the employer disclosed the informatio­n with actual malice or with the intent to mislead. For the purposes of the statute, actual malice means knowledge that the informatio­n was false or was provided with reckless disregard of its truth or falsity.

If you can rebut the presumptio­n that your former employer disclosed informatio­n about you in good faith, you then may have a claim against the former employer for defamation or interferin­g with your prospectiv­e employment relationsh­ip.

Notwithsta­nding the protection that the blacklisti­ng statute affords to employers, many businesses will direct all requests from prospectiv­e employers to be handled by human-resources personnel, who will provide only a neutral reference, such as the dates of employment. Employers that follow neutral reference policies consistent­ly naturally reduce their risk of liability to former workers.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States