The Arizona Republic

Obama adviser: Reform would be economic boon for Arizona

- By Rebekah L. Sanders | The Republic | azcentral.com

Attempting to put a pocketbook spin on the immigratio­n debate, a top economic adviser to the president said Wednesday that Arizona would see an economic boon if Congress passed legislatio­n granting citizenshi­p to illegal immigrants and additional worker visas for industries such as farming and engineerin­g.

The sweeping overhaul of the nation’s immigratio­n system would boost Arizona’s employment, tax revenue and even

housing values as soon as next year, said Gene Sperling, director of the National Economic Council. The cost of inaction, he said, would be high.

“Immigratio­n reform is the right thing to do, but it is also very clear from a variety of independen­t sources, it is the economical­ly smart thing to do as well,” Sperling said during a conference call with reporters.

The White House’s new offensive comes as momentum for immigratio­n reform appears in danger of stalling in the House of Representa­tives. Months of wrangling in the Senate produced a comprehens­ive reform package in June. But since its passage, the lower chamber has approved nothing.

The Senate bill included tighter border security, checks on businesses hiring illegal immigrants, visas for highand low-skilled workers and a path to citizenshi­p for the country’s estimated 11 million illegal immigrants, among other provisions. The pathway to citizenshi­p would require undocument­ed immigrants to pay fees and back taxes and wait at least 13 years.

During Senate negotiatio­ns, President Barack Obama largely played a behind-the-scenes role, preferring to allow reform-minded Republican­s, like Arizona Sens. John McCain and Jeff Flake, cajole members of their own party to get on board. But as Congress prepares to leave Washington on recess for five weeks, the president may be applying greater pressure to prevent immigratio­n from becoming a distant memory.

In Arizona, the pathway to citizenshi­p and expanded worker programs would increase the state’s economic output by $676 million and create 8,000 new jobs by 2014, White House officials said, citing an analysis by the independen­t research firm Regional Economic Models Inc. The economic impact of giving citizenshi­p to the undocument­ed immigrants in Arizona is estimated at $265 million and 3,250 jobs.

While all states would see job growth and higher economic output, Arizona would be one of the10 that would benefit most, the study found. Health care, retail and constructi­on would see the biggest gains in employment.

Other states with the largest projected increases in jobs were California, Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois, New Jersey, Georgia, North Carolina and Pennsylvan­ia. The states projected to see large job growth have large numbers of undocument­ed workers.

While the Obama administra­tion, which has made immigratio­n reform among its top priorities, had political motives for pointing out the financial benefits of immigratio­n reform, lesspartis­an studies have highlighte­d similar potential economic benefits.

The nonpartisa­n Congressio­nal Budget Office, for example, found immigratio­n reform would reduce the deficit. Economists, including Douglas Holtz- Eakin, former chief economic-policy adviser to McCain during his 2008 presidenti­al campaign, forecast benefits to the U.S. economy from new immigrants, such as a rise in entreprene­urship.

Conservati­ves opposed to the Senate plan, however, say it would hurt the economy. The Heritage Foundation issued a report that said the bill would cost $6 trillion, arguing newly legalized immigrants would collect more in government benefits than they pay in taxes.

On Monday, the White House used numbers from the Regional Economic Models report to spotlight the boost to farm production in Arizona. Agricultur­e Secretary Tom Vilsack said legalizing undocument­ed farmworker­s and expanding a guest-worker program would keep food prices low and create jobs. The report said that by 2020, the temporary-worker program proposed in the Senate bill would create 993 new jobs for U.S. citizens and immigrants.

For high-skilled workers, the report estimated expanded H-1B visas would generate at least 790 new positions at companies such as Intel Corp. in Arizona in 2014. The economic ripple effect would mean an additional 3,200 new jobs throughout the state.

White House officials highlighte­d the state-by-state findings as part of a strategy to solidify public support for the president’s agenda ahead of the summer recess. If members of Congress feel pressure from constituen­ts at town halls, officials hope House Speaker John Boehner would be forced to hold a vote on the Senate’s comprehens­ive immigratio­n package come September, despite saying for weeks that he would not.

“The economic case we’ve laid out here is pretty persuasive,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said. “Why are Republican­s in the House opposed to this? I’m not really sure why.”

House Republican­s have held hearings on legislatio­n to deal with immigratio­n reform on issues popular with conservati­ves, such as border security, but so far elements such as a path to citizenshi­p have been missing. It’s unclear when the House will act on any bills.

Catalina Amuedo-Dorantes, a professor of economics at San Diego State University, said she wasn’t surprised by the positive figures in the report cited by the White House. Her research focuses on labor and immigratio­n.

With immigratio­n reform, “you are simply allowing what might have been an undergroun­d activity to surface, flourish and contribute to gross domestic product and taxes,” she wrote in an e-mail. “Why wouldn’t that create employment and increase (economic output)?”

Arizona businesses hope such reports will move the needle in Congress, said Garrick Taylor, a spokesman for the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry, which is lobbying for reform.

“When you find analysis after analysis indicating positive results, that might provide the informatio­n that certain fence-sitting members of Congress need to move their vote into the ‘yes’ column,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States