The Arizona Republic

Travelers may perceive USA as unwelcomin­g

-

Economics. “On multiple fronts — diplomacy, trade, border control, visa policy — internatio­nal markets are receiving a message that America is no longer a welcoming destinatio­n.”

The expected decline marks a reversal from recent years, when foreign visitors rose to 77 million in 2016 from 54 million in 2009, said Roger Dow, CEO of the U.S. Travel Associatio­n, which represents airlines, hotels and resorts. He said each visitor spends an average of $4,300 over 18 days.

“We’re hearing concern,” Dow said. “Our message to the Trump administra­tion is real simple: ‘We’re real good at America being closed for terrorism and open for business.’ What we need them to do is say that.”

After the second ban was blocked, Trump told a Nashville audience March 15 that he would appeal all the way to the Supreme Court. “The danger is clear. The law is clear. The need for my executive order is clear,” he said. “The best way to keep foreign terrorists or, as some people would say in certain instances, radical Islamic terrorists from attacking our country is to stop them from entering our country in the first place.”

The administra­tion wants to enact enhanced vetting procedures for all foreign visitors that would remain even after the temporary ban was lifted. That could further discourage foreign tourists as well as people coming to the USA for business and school.

Nearly 600 colleges and universiti­es wrote Feb. 3 to Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly to express concerns about discouragi­ng internatio­nal students, a major revenue source for universiti­es.

One million internatio­nal students spend $32 billion a year, according to Terry Hartle, a senior vice president for the American Council on Education. Only about 15,000 students would be affected by the travel ban, but Trump’s policies could discourage students from other countries with options to study in the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia, Hartle said.

“It’s an undesirabl­e, self-inflicted wound,” Hartle said.

Business is worried as well. A group of 97 Silicon Valley companies — led by Apple, Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Twitter, Yelp and Netflix — argued in one of the lawsuits challengin­g Trump’s travel ban that the order would make it more difficult to “attract talent, business and investment to the United States.” Other examples of possible downsides to the travel ban: Reporting Corp. found a relatively low increase of 0.9% in inbound travel to the USA in the first seven weeks of this year, compared with larger gains in each of the previous two years. “This is not a particular­ly encouragin­g statistic for the USA,” said ForwardKey­s CEO Olivier Jager.

& Co., a tourism and marketing group for the nation’s largest city, forecast 300,000 fewer internatio­nal visitors this year compared with last year, a loss of $600 million in spending and $900 million in rippling economic effects. The drop would be the first since the recession in 2008-09. The group plans to spend $3 million to advertise in the United Kingdom, Mexico, Germany and Spain to reinforce that “we’re a place that welcomes everybody,” Deputy Mayor Alicia Glen said.

the next three years, Los Angeles could lose 800,000 internatio­nal visitors and $736 million in direct spending because of the perception that visitors aren’t welcome, says Ernest Wooden Jr., CEO for Discover Los Angeles. He said the tourism group plans an internatio­nal advertisin­g campaign to “roll out the red carpet.” Contributi­ng: Alan Gomez

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States