The Arizona Republic

Douglas seeking schools tax hike

Teacher raises, building repairs are focus of plan

- ALIA BEARD RAU More online: For coverage of education issues, visit education.azcentral.com.

Arizona Superinten­dent of Public Instructio­n Diane Douglas is calling for a state sales-tax hike to fund an immediate 11 percent teacher pay raise — five times the amount Gov. Doug Ducey proposed in his budget — and an additional $100 million a year for school repairs.

Douglas is proposing to ask voters to permanentl­y expand the Propositio­n 301 sales tax to a full cent. Prop. 301 currently taxes sales at six-tenths of a cent and brings in about $600 million a year for education. It’s set to expire in 2021.

Douglas said her plan would generate an additional $400 million a year. For the first two years, she wants $300 million a year to fund a one-time 11 percent teacher salary hike and $100 million a year to go to the School Facilities Board for school repairs. After that, the plan calls for $350 million a year to cover the teacher raises and $50 million a year to the School Facilities Board.

“The average teacher would see

about a $5,000 raise,” Douglas said. “Our teachers need to be paid more.”

Douglas made the announceme­nt Thursday morning at an Arizona Business Education Coalition forum.

“It’s no wonder we sometimes have a very difficult time attracting teachers. They work in an environmen­t where they feel restricted, they feel disrespect­ed and most certainly underpaid,” Douglas said. “We owe it to our students and teachers to make sure we have a dedicated funding stream. I implore you to settle for no less.”

Douglas did not indicate when she would like the measure put before voters. She said she hopes to have the Legislatur­e put it on the ballot instead of going through the process of collecting thousands of signatures through the initiative process.

“The sooner, the better,” she said. “We need to get the money to our teachers.”

It is generally too late for new legislatio­n to be introduced this session unless it is part of the budget, but it could occur during a special session or during the regular session next year and still qualify for the fall 2018 ballot.

Douglas and Ducey are both up for reelection in 2018.

Ducey and the Legislatur­e are negotiatin­g next year’s budget. Ducey has proposed a 0.4 percent raise for teachers each year for the next five years. Preliminar­y legislativ­e proposals indicate Republican lawmakers are pushing for at least a 1 percent raise and possibly more. Democratic lawmakers have called for a 4 percent raise next year.

Douglas said she believes the public support exists for a tax increase, if the money is focused on teacher raises.

“I hate taxes. And I’m not a particular fan of sales taxes, because I think they can hurt our most vulnerable families,” she said. “But that’s the system we have.”

Douglas’ proposal to set aside a portion of the funds for school capital costs is an acknowledg­ment of a looming state lawsuit over school funding.

The Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest is expected to file a lawsuit on behalf of several school districts alleging the governor and state Legislatur­e have shorted districts hundreds of millions of dollars a year for buildingma­intenance and soft-capital needs. Attorney Tim Hogan in late February said the lawsuit could come within the next month or two.

Ducey in his budget proposal included an additional $17 million to the School Facilities Board for building maintenanc­e, while Republican lawmakers are considerin­g about twice that. But both proposals continue hundreds of millions of dollars in annual cuts directly to schools for other school maintenanc­e and soft capital such as technology, textbooks and buses.

Since 2009, ongoing cuts in this area have topped $2 billion.

While discussion­s have swirled among education groups for more than a year over how to address the looming sunset of the Prop. 301 sales tax, Douglas is the first statewide elected official to publicly support expanding the tax.

Ducey has been less publicly clear on his position. Earlier this year, he said he would work with education leaders to develop a new Prop. 301 proposal to take to the voters at some point down the line, but he declined to say whether he would support increasing the tax.

When asked about Douglas’ proposal, Ducey spokesman Daniel Scarpinato said in a statement that “the governor is on record supporting the extension of Prop. 301, but it needs to be done in a way that makes sense, is good public policy, and most importantl­y, can actually win support from legislator­s and the voters.”

Part of the Prop. 301 conversati­on has been about whether the money is going where it should and whether additional accountabi­lity measures should be in a future plan. Opinions vary, from those wanting more money for teacher salaries to those who support designatin­g funds for full-day kindergart­en.

Douglas said Thursday she is open to discussion­s about tweaking the revenue streams for the existing tax as well.

The current tax designates how the money can be spent. Any new proposal could keep the same restrictio­ns or create new ones. Here is how just more than $643 million was allocated in fiscal 2016:

» Teacher salaries, reducing class sizes, student programs such as reading interventi­on: $364 million.

» K-12 public schools, to fund five additional school days and related salary costs: $86 million.

» Universiti­es’ technology and research-based initiative­s: $69.6 million.

» School-improvemen­t revenue bonds to repair school buildings: $64 million.

» Reimbursem­ent to the state for income-tax credits for families that earn less than $25,000: $25 million.

» Community colleges and tribal colleges, to fund workforce-developmen­t programs: $18 million.

» K-12 public schools, for school safety and character education: $8 million.

» Developmen­t of a statewide computeriz­ed database to track attendance and performanc­e: $7 million.

» Tutoring for students in failing schools: $1.5 million.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States