The Arizona Republic

Poll: Nearly two-thirds of voters say Ariz. utility regulators are ‘corrupted’

- RYAN RANDAZZO

Arizona voters are split along political lines on President Donald Trump, pardoning former Sheriff Joe Arpaio and other issues. But they broadly agree on at least one thing: the Arizona Corporatio­n Commission.

Most of Arizona’s likely voters say state utility regulators have been “corrupted,” according to an August poll by HighGround Public Affairs.

“Republican­s are still strongly supportive of the president and the sheriff’s pardon, but they are not currently supportive of the activities of the Corporatio­n Commission,” said Paul Bentz, vice president of research and strategy for HighGround.

The poll indicated 65.5 percent of voters overall say the five-member

commission that sets utility rates and policies has been corrupted by outside influences and spending.

The poll of 400 likely voters contacted people on both landline phones and cellphones, and has a margin of error of about 5 percent.

The commission­ers, currently all Republican­s, act in a quasi-judicial role, deciding what rates monopoly utilities can charge their customers for water, gas, electricit­y and sewer service, in addition to other duties. The commission­ers are Chairman Tom Forese, Andy Tobin, Doug Little, Boyd Dunn and Robert Burns.

The commission issued a statement in response to the poll.

“The Arizona Corporatio­n Commission and its staff are committed to transparen­cy,” it said. “Not only do we work every day to fulfill our responsibi­lity to the people of Arizona to ensure they have safe, reliable, and affordable utility services, we are also helping to grow Arizona’s economy as we help local entreprene­urs achieve their dream of starting a business and we are protecting Arizona citizens by enforcing an ethical securities marketplac­e.”

The state’s largest utility, Arizona Public Service Co., spent millions last year supporting three winning candidates and is widely suspected of spending in 2014 to help the two candidates who won office that year.

APS officials don’t deny that involvemen­t.

Last month, the commission­ers unanimousl­y agreed on a $95 million annual rate hike for APS.

“There really is a credibilit­y crisis here,” Bentz said.

The commission­ers clearly are aware of the cloud over their offices.

Dunn recently initiated a series of meetings he said he hopes will lead to the creation of ethics policies for the commission­ers.

A smaller percentage of Republican­s (63.9 percent) than Democrats (67.7 percent) said in the poll they believe the commission is corrupt. Slightly fewer independen­ts (61.1 percent) said commission­ers are corrupt.

“We couldn’t get the parties to agree on any other issue — Trump, the sheriff, the (Jeff) Flake-(Kyrsten) Sinema race,” Bentz said. “There hasn’t been acrossthe-board belief on anything else.”

HighGround did not represent any candidates for the commission in 2016 and is not representi­ng any for 2018. The firm paid for the survey without outside sponsorshi­p.

In addition to candidate campaigns, HighGround lists the League of Arizona Cities and Towns, the Profession­al Fire Fighters of Arizona and the Arizona Hospital and Health Care Associatio­n among its clients.

Besides APS spending money to help elect the commission­ers, regulators have faced other recent scandals, including indictment­s of former Chairman Gary Pierce, his wife, lobbyist Jim Norton and water-utility owner George Johnson in connection with an alleged bribery scheme.

Also, in 2015, then-Chairwoman Susan Bitter Smith resigned amid a conflict-ofinterest controvers­y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States