The Arizona Republic

We should count every vote, but we can do it faster

- Your Turn Joel Edman Guest columnist Joel Edman is the executive director of the Arizona Advocacy Foundation, a nonpartisa­n organizati­on that seeks to educate Arizona voters about their rights and their democracy. Reach him at joel@azadvocacy.org.

As this year’s routine ballot-counting process went on, some politician­s began spinning wild conspiracy theories or trying to turn the process into yet another partisan issue. This is all dangerous to our democracy, especially if it becomes yet another excuse to chip away at our fundamenta­l right to vote.

The good news is that we can count ballots faster if we ask our local elections officials what the real hurdles are. And we can do so without burdening voters or throwing out valid ballots.

Why does it take a couple of weeks to finish counting? As a recent post on the Arizona secretary of state’s website explains, it’s largely due to the legally required process of comparing signatures on early ballot envelopes to those on file for each voter, ensuring those early ballots were cast by genuine Arizona voters. This process requires specialize­d training, necessaril­y limiting the number of people who can do it and slowing down the count.

What can we do about it? For starters, former Maricopa County County Recorder Helen Purcell outlined at least two good ideas in a recent interview:

❚ Update Maricopa County’s 22year-old counting machines, which can count only 75,000 votes per day.

❚ Change the state law that bars counties from starting the count until one week before Election Day.

We can also expand on Maricopa County’s program that allows voters to sign up for text and email updates on the status of their ballots. Bringing that program statewide would prompt more voters to contact their county elections office about outstandin­g issues, so their ballot can be counted sooner.

We should also work to free up more dollars in our county recorders’ limited budgets to invest in full-time staff who could be trained in signature verificati­on. For example, we could save the onerous costs of processing thousands of paper registrati­on forms every two years by switching to a secure, automatic voter-registrati­on system.

On the other hand, most of the ideas coming from politician­s are pretty bad. For example, forcing voters who drop off their ballots on Election Day — an estimated 320,000 this year — to wait in line and feed their ballots into counting machines would lead to much longer lines at the polls. That’s the last thing we need.

Imposing an earlier deadline to mail in early ballots would also lead to longer lines, and would make us an outlier nationally (currently, only three states don’t count ballots received by Election Day). If anything, we should look to the 12 states — including Ohio, Texas and Utah — that actually count ballots received after Election Day.

Finally, let’s not take a step backward from the uniform “cure period” for early=ballot signature mismatches agreed to by all 15 counties in a recent legal settlement. Mismatches occur on a very small percentage of ballots, often because a voter has had a stroke or other medical condition that alters their handwritin­g. Providing those voters a short window of time to verify their identity, like we do for voters who don’t have their ID with them on Election Day, is perfectly reasonable.

If we want a faster count in Arizona, let’s listen to the folks who do the counting. It we let partisan political agendas take priority, it will be our fundamenta­l right to vote that suffers.

 ?? MARK HENLE/THE REPUBLIC ?? There are many ways we could speed up the ballot-counting process in Arizona.
MARK HENLE/THE REPUBLIC There are many ways we could speed up the ballot-counting process in Arizona.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States