GOP goes MIA on health care
The Obamacare marketplace has stabilized in Arizona and across the country.
It is worth noting what Obamacare is, and is not, now that it has stabilized. And how Republicans still don’t have a credible alternative to the march of Democrats toward ever greater government involvement in health care.
In 2018, there was just one company in Maricopa County offering Obamacare policies and a scramble was on to get any policies offered in Arizona’s rural counties.
Next year, reportedly there will be five companies offering plans in Maricopa. Pima will have three.
Eight rural counties are likely to have only one provider, but they aren’t facing the prospect of none.
After skyrocketing in the early years, Obamacare premiums leveled off for this year and are expected to remain so next.
Arizona’s experience is shared in most parts of the country. The turbulence in the Obamacare marketplace appears to have settled down.
But now that the Obamacare marketplace has stabilized, it is different than originally envisioned.
As envisioned, the exchanges were to be an alternative to employer-provided health insurance for everyone. Those with pre-existing conditions wouldn’t be excluded. Everyone would be required to have health insurance and everyone, irrespective of medical risk, would pay the same.
That’s not what Obamacare turned out to be. Instead, it is a governmentsubsidized safety net for those with health problems but who earn too much to qualify for Medicaid.
The federal mandate never really succeeded in forcing healthy people into buying insurance that, from the beginning, was a lousy deal for them. And then Republicans eliminated the penalty for not doing so.
In Arizona, over 80 percent of those purchasing an Obamacare policy received a premium subsidy from the federal government. And given the high deductibles in Obamacare policies, even subsidized they aren’t a very good deal for those without current or chronic health problems. The healthy are still shunning the Obamacare market.
Obamacare generally outlawed health insurance policies that would make sense for everyone else. Healthy people can’t be charged less. All policies have to cover a large suite of benefits, irrespective of whether the customer needs or wants them.
The Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that 27 percent of potential private insurance customers have what, in the previous regimen, would have been considered a disqualifying pre-existing condition. That leaves a lot of people unserved by the individual health insurance market as reshaped by Obamacare.
The answer for Democrats is, of course, more government. Either have government take over at least the financing of all health care. Or, at a minimum, have government offer an individual health insurance policy in competition with private insurers. The latter will make a difference only if it is also heavily subsidized with federal tax dollars.
Republicans say they favor marketbased alternatives centered in consumer choice. But they lack either the conviction, or the political courage, to actually offer any.
There cannot be a market-based alternative centered in consumer choice without medical underwriting and the ability to pick and choose among potential benefits.
That means that subsidizing the health care of the seriously or chronically sick has to be done entirely through the tax mechanism, not also through the premium mechanism. Any individual insurance market that charges the same irrespective of medical risk will be a bad deal for too many.
There are alternative ways to subsidize, entirely through taxes, the health care of those with pre-existing conditions who would be shut out of a medically underwritten individual market. But Republicans have given up attempting to design and sell one. Instead, they are pledging to keep the requirement that insurers accept all comers and sharply limit pricing according to risk.
With respect to Obamacare’s mandated benefits, Republicans are being cagey. The Trump administration is attempting through regulation to expand the ability to evade them, through association plans and what are called shortterm limited duration plans. The Arizona Legislature passed a bill aligning Arizona law with the proposed expansion of the latter last session.
People with serious health problems shouldn’t go without care or face financial ruin. Healthy individuals should have options in the individual health insurance market that are good, rather than lousy, deals.
If Republicans aren’t willing to propose, and publicly advocate, credible alternatives to accomplish both, the march toward government being the health care provider for all will steadily advance.