The Arizona Republic

Attorney general is asked to look into Phoenix Uber/Lyft fees at Sky Harbor

- Contact reporter Andrew Oxford at andrew.oxford@arizonarep­ublic.com or on Twitter at @andrewboxf­ord.

from Uber and Lyft.

Both companies are threatenin­g to end curbside service at Sky Harbor, raising the prospect of mass confusion as travelers step out of an airport that prides itself as America’s friendlies­t.

State Rep. Nancy Barto, R-Phoenix, not only disagrees with the fee but argues it violates a provision of the state Constituti­on approved by voters as Propositio­n 126 last year that prohibits new or increased taxes on services.

“It is such a blatant disregard of the will of Arizona voters who passed Prop. 126 in 2018,” Barto said.

Under Arizona law, any legislator can direct the attorney general to investigat­e local government policies that might violate the state constituti­on.

An offending local government has 30 days to change its policies if the attorney general finds it is running afoul of Arizona’s constituti­on, or the state can cut off funding. Known as an SB 1487 investigat­ion, the process has been used to quash local regulation­s of vacation rentals, plastic bags and confiscate­d firearms.

Barto filed a complaint process on Thursday. under the

City Attorney Cris Meyer has argued that the fee increase is constituti­onal, contending it is a fee for accessing municipal property — in this case, the curb of the airport.

“The constituti­on does not bar municipali­ties from charging a fee to access

and use municipal-owned property,” he said. “Many companies, from ground transporta­tion to concession­s, pay fees to conduct commercial business that provide services to customers at the airport.”

City officials have argued that the fee is not a tax but merely the price of using the curb at the airport.

Barto’s complaint did not come as a surprise.

Barto, who is running for state Senate, had said she would file such a complaint after the council initially voted on the fee increase during an Oct. 16 meeting. The council had to to vote again this month due to a technical problem.

The Attorney General’s Office did not immediatel­y respond to a request for comment.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States