The Arizona Republic

Here’s what the new robocall bill could change — and what it might not

- Ken Colburn Columnist

QUESTION: How much impact will the new robocall bill really have?

ANSWER: Anyone with a phone knows the growing irritation with getting nuisance phone calls from computers and wants it to stop. Americans are being deluged with tens of billions of calls per month, and there’s nothing to suggest that it won’t grow larger if left unchecked.

Our legislator­s in a bi-partisan effort created new legislatio­n known as the TRACED (Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcemen­t and Deterrence) Act with the intent of fighting the problem. Some parts of it aren’t going to change much, while others could go a long way to cutting down on spoofed calls from bad actors.

New fines

The law now allows for fines up to $10,000 per call, which sounds like a deterrent until you understand how ineffectiv­e fines have been in the past.

According to a Wall Street Journal report from early last year, the Federal Communicat­ions Commission had fined robocaller­s $208 million but when it came to actually collecting the fines, they recovered just under $7,000. That’s a paltry .000033% of the fines issued since 2015. The Federal Trade Commission has fared a little better by collecting $121 million of the $1.5 billion that it has issued — at 8%.

Many of the illegal operators are small businesses that have no assets to seize and no ability to ever pay the fine. Others simply shut down their operations and pop up as a completely new company or move offshore outside of U.S. jurisdicti­on.

Increasing fines will only deter legitimate companies with real assets at risk, which is why many view this portion of the bill to be nothing more than grandstand­ing.

Changing an existing law that’s currently being ignored by criminals isn’t going to change much.

Caller authentica­tion

It’s already illegal to use fake numbers on caller ID, but since the technology that allows people in foreign countries to easily spoof any number they want, the law has no teeth.

The portion of the new law that is likely to have a solid impact is the requiremen­t for wireless carriers to implement a caller authentica­tion process that will make it much more difficult for bad actors to fake their caller ID number.

The telecom industry has been working on a platform that will let customers know when a caller ID has been verified or if it’s a suspected junk call.

Additional­ly, the FCC has made it clear that cellular providers can block unwanted calls without having to ask customers first, which will lead to automatic call-blocking services.

The new law also says that the phone companies can’t charge extra for these call blocking and caller ID verificati­on services. (Until they are in place, datadoctor­s.com has some tips for what you can do now which include letting calls from unknown numbers go to voicemail or using an app that allows you to screen phone calls.)

Unfortunat­ely, all of the current technology under developmen­t won’t work on landlines, so the FCC and phone companies will have to come up with an alternativ­e solution for folks still using landlines.

Legal robocalls

Keep in mind, there are many legal robocalls such as pharmacy prescripti­on alerts, charities and political parties to name a few.

You also may have agreed to be contacted by an automated system when you ‘agreed’ to terms and conditions of a recent purchase.

 ?? GETTY IMAGES/ISTOCKPHOT­O ?? A court rules political robocalls are protected by the First Amendment.
GETTY IMAGES/ISTOCKPHOT­O A court rules political robocalls are protected by the First Amendment.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States