The Arizona Republic

Hobbs blocks grants from Ducey’s term

- Stacey Barchenger Reach reporter Stacey Barchenger at stacey.barchenger@arizonarep­ublic.com or 480-416-5669. Follow her on Twitter @sbarchenge­r.

Top members of Gov. Katie Hobbs’ administra­tion accused her Republican predecesso­r of illegally awarding about $210 million in federal COVID-19 response grants in his last days in office, and said Wednesday those grants were invalid as a result.

According to Hobbs’ aides, 19 grants to 16 organizati­ons between Dec. 30 to Jan. 1 — the last three days of Republican Gov. Doug Ducey’s term — were given in violation of a state law that requires a competitiv­e process before money is awarded. In a briefing with reporters, they alleged that Ducey and his top staffers intentiona­lly amended grant paperwork in a rush job to prevent Hobbs from having a say over how the money is spent.

“It’s clear when you look at the amendments that were made by the Ducey administra­tion at the 11th hour, that they were trying to bind the hands of the Hobbs administra­tion, and prevent them from exercising responsibl­e stewardshi­p of taxpayer funds here,” said Sean Berens, senior counsel in Hobbs’ office.

Berens pledged a more broad review of grants awarded during Ducey’s tenure that drew on American Rescue Plan Act funds, to ensure they comply with state law and federal strings attached to the money.

He said the Hobbs administra­tion would soon begin a competitiv­e process to award the approximat­ely $210 million, which included $75 million to continue Ducey’s much-touted summer school program for a second year, $6.4 million for an emergency shelter, and other projects. By notifying those organizati­ons this week that their grant agreements were invalid, Hobbs can now direct the dollars to her own priorities, though her administra­tion said they were forced to take action.

“We didn’t have a choice in the matter,” Berens said. “In the Hobbs administra­tion we follow the law. We did this in part to protect the organizati­ons in question, because they could be subject to claw back action by the Treasury Department if they were party to an illegal grant agreement.”

But Daniel Scarpinato, former chief of staff to Ducey who spoke on behalf of the former administra­tion, said Hobbs was “playing politics” and trying to undo Ducey’s work, acknowledg­ing that many of the grants went to organizati­ons that reflected the former governor’s priorities. Scarpinato left the Ducey administra­tion in August 2021 but continued to serve as an adviser to the governor.

“Gov. Ducey and our team played this by the book, they were very careful and deliberate and attorneys reviewed and provided guidance,” Scarpinato said. “It’s very disappoint­ing the new governor has decided to use some very good causes and organizati­ons, including summer school, as a political football and now hold these folks basically hostage.”

Did actions violate state law?

Ducey awarded all of the state’s American Rescue Plan Act dollars before leaving office, including $950 million in the final quarter, leaving none to Hobbs’ discretion, according to the Hobbs administra­tion.

In the briefing with reporters, Hobbs officials questioned why Ducey’s director of the Arizona Department of Administra­tion waived competitiv­e grant applicatio­n requiremen­ts through Dec. 29.

Such requiremen­ts, which are meant to help the state get the best deal when it spends taxpayer dollars, were waived during the COVID-19 pandemic, but were extended months beyond that by Andy Tobin, the former director of the department, according to the Hobbs administra­tion. Tobin did not return a call seeking comment Wednesday, and Hobbs’ office did not provide documentat­ion of Tobin’s actions.

Hobbs’ staff is reviewing the waiver, which is allowed under Arizona law in certain circumstan­ces, to see if it complies with law. State law also says that anyone who violates competitiv­e grantmakin­g requiremen­ts could face a felony charge, but on that issue, Berens didn’t take a stand on whether Hobbs would pursue such punishment.

“Right now, we’re focused on good stewardshi­p of taxpayer funds,” Berens said. “I imagine a review will take place in the future.”

Ducey’s use of the ARPA money has drawn previous critique, namely from U.S. Treasury that threatened to claw back money that the former governor earmarked for schools that did not impose public health protocols. Treasury had not followed through on those threats, but Hobbs earlier this month said she would end that program to avoid the federal government trying to recoup money that was already spent by districts.

Grants in question for host of projects

Ducey’s administra­tion amended over 40 grants drawing on ARPA dollars in his final two weeks in office, according to documentat­ion obtained by The Arizona Republic through a public records request. Those grants awarded a collective $430 million and are under review, but the Hobbs administra­tion has rejected fewer than half at this point in the review.

Seven of the invalid grants do not include specifics about how the organizati­ons can spend the money, other than a broad statement that it must mitigate the impacts of COVID-19, which is required under ARPA rules. Those seven agreements say the recipients should submit project proposals within 30 days. Most of the grant agreements are signed by former Ducey chief of staff Daniel Ruiz and Ducey’s budget director, Matthew Gress, who is now a state representa­tive. Scarpinato said because the grants reimburse organizati­ons for money spent, that process would allow the state to ensure the projects were in line with ARPA provisions.

One grant recipient, Amira Learning, was awarded up to $2.45 million with a formal proposal to come, according to the records.

Mark Angel, the company’s chief executive officer, said in an email the organizati­on planned to use the money to continue offering reading tutor software to students in 100 school districts.

“We haven’t had any communicat­ion from the Governor’s Office and we therefore have no comment,” Angel wrote. “We’ve only read about this in the media.”

The Hobbs administra­tion said letters notifying recipients the grants were invalid were sent Tuesday, but officials did not provide a copy of one such letter when requested by The Republic on Wednesday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States