The Arizona Republic

To fix Rio Verde Foothills water woes, county back off

- Your Turn Solange Whitehead City Council member. Scottsdale

On Friday, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisor­s voted down the intergover­nmental agreement to deliver water to the unincorpor­ated residents in Rio Verde Foothills. It’s the second time in nine months that the supervisor­s has voted against a water solution for these residents. I am deeply disappoint­ed.

In Scottsdale, we know that water management prevents water wars and policies must be free of politics. For these reasons, the City Council directed the city manager and attorneys to develop an intergover­nmental agreement with counterpar­ts at Maricopa County. These negotiatio­ns also involved legislator­s and staff and the Arizona Attorney General’s Office.

Scottsdale’s involvemen­t was to assist Maricopa County in securing a regulated water supply for its residents in Rio Verde Foothills. Something these residents have never had and is increasing­ly important as wells run dry in the area.

Within a week of the draft IGA’s completion, the Scottsdale City Council unanimousl­y approved it allowing flexibilit­y to best serve all parties. Council email in-boxes and City Hall were filled with RVF residents supporting the plan.

Now RVF residents are once again without hope. The county rejected the IGA with a demand that Scottsdale enter into a contract with EPCOR, a private company, to provide water for Rio Verde Foothills residents. This places legal responsibi­lity and liability for RVF water service on Scottsdale and its taxpayers.

Scottsdale is a city government, not a utility. Intergover­nmental agreements, by definition, are between government­s. IGAs are the mechanism by which one municipali­ty can share resources with residents from another municipali­ty.

The draft IGA between Maricopa County and Scottsdale would have provided treated water to RVF residents, upheld Scottsdale’s drought management plan, and met the city’s obligation­s to its residents. The framework is what matters, not the water source.

In its resolution, the supervisor­s explicitly require EPCOR-sourced water. What is unclear to me is why.

Had the Board of Supervisor­s approved the IGA, water could have flowed to existing residents quickly. Scottsdale is negotiatin­g water allotment increases from existing sources. No new contracts to bid, no new infrastruc­ture.

Rio Verde Foothills and Scottsdale residents are represente­d by Maricopa County Supervisor Tom Galvin. He should reconsider the IGA to best serve constituen­ts on both sides of the border.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States