The Arizona Republic

Facebook’s new monthly charge: Is it hoax or real?

- Ken Colburn Columnist Ken Colburn is founder and CEO of Data Doctors Computer Services, datadoctor­s.com. Ask any tech question at facebook.com/DataDoctor­s or on Twitter @TheDataDoc.

Q: Is Facebook really getting ready to start charging users?

A: The list of hoaxes that have plagued the world’s largest social media platform continues to grow, but one that has persisted for over a decade is that they will start charging everyone to continue using it.

One of the more common recurring hoaxes claims that Facebook will start charging a monthly fee ranging from $3.99 to $9.99 starting this summer.

The usual sure signs of a hoax include poor grammar/punctuatio­n, the instructio­ns to copy and paste to a new post instead of sharing, and that it’s being reported on television.

Hoaxes rely on users not doing their homework and taking posts at face value, which is unfortunat­ely quite effective.

Until recently, it was easy to tell anyone that anything claiming Facebook would start charging users was a hoax, but all that changed last month.

Facebook ‘verificati­on’ subscripti­on

Meta, the parent company for both Facebook and Instagram announced on February 19th that they were going to start testing an optional paid account “verificati­on” service.

The fee of $11.99 per month for computers and $14.99 for smartphone­s is only available in Australia and New Zealand during their initial tests and seems to be inspired by Twitter’s change to charging $7.99 per month for verified accounts.

There’s no question that Meta’s stock price is down significan­tly from its highs, so it’s not surprising to see this radical shift to generate revenue.

Getting verified used to be free and limited to public figures, but the new verificati­on subscripti­on will allow anyone over the age of 17 to get verified with a government-issued ID to avoid the problems Twitter experience­d when it opened verificati­on to anyone.

The claims from Meta are that verified accounts cost the company more and that this approach will limit the ability of scammers to create fake verified accounts.

Human support

Another “feature” of this new subscripti­on service is an ambiguous reference to “direct access to customer support,” which likely would be to address the frustratio­n that millions have when they have a serious issue with their account.

The press release stated you’ll get: Help when you need it with access to a real person for common account issues.

Speaking directly with a human for customer support is currently impossible and regaining control of a compromise­d account is treacherou­s at best.

It looks like Meta is counting on those that rely on Facebook and Instagram to make money (they refer to as creators) will see the value in paying what some are calling “protection money” for their impersonat­ion protection­s.

Increased visibility

They refer to “increased visibility and reach with prominence in some areas of the platform – like search, comments and recommenda­tions,” which could be valuable for those creators trying to establish an audience.

Already verified?

The announceme­nt also included this: “As we test and learn, there will be no changes to accounts on Instagram and Facebook that are already verified based on prior requiremen­ts.”

It hasn’t been a runaway success at Twitter, but the user base of Facebook and Instagram is exponentia­lly larger, so it remains to be seen if this new subscripti­on will have the desired impact on their stock price.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States