The Arizona Republic

Environmen­tal legislatio­n to watch for this year in Arizona

- Joan Meiners Climate reporter Arizona Republic USA TODAY NETWORK Environmen­tal justice bills:

Beneath uncommonly gray, drizzly skies, a trio of high school students from Brophy College Preparator­y school’s Native American Club asked the crowd sheltered under white pop-up tents at the Arizona Capitol to stand, close their eyes and “really think about our land around us in Arizona, our mountains, our water, our sacred lands, the people before us that came here.”

As they spoke, a line of participan­ts formed in front of a small table to the east of the concrete stage at Wesley Bolin Memorial Plaza. The rest of the crowd pivoted left on command to recognize each cardinal direction in turn.

Reverentia­lly, the people in line uncapped reusable water bottles and poured the contents into three glass serving bowls on the table, blending the Phoenix tap water sourced from the Colorado, Salt and Verde rivers with liquid from across the state.

Brimming in stark contrast to Arizona’s rivers and aquifers, the collected water was meant to remind those gathered last Thursday for Environmen­t Day at the Capitol of priorities before attendees scattered to reinforce goals in meetings with Arizona legislator­s early in the 2024 session.

Sandy Bahr, who directs the Grand Canyon Chapter of the Sierra Club and organized the event with other nonprofit leaders, hopes this will be the year state leaders take meaningful, legal steps to protect water resources, act on climate and clean energy and address environmen­tal injustice and racism.

A performanc­e review of 2023 bills affecting the environmen­t

Environmen­talists in Arizona have reason to be wary about how elected representa­tives in the state Senate and House will react to bills seeking protection­s for water resources, guidelines to limit climate warming and funding to help vulnerable communitie­s adapt to increasing heat extremes.

With most pro-environmen­t bills introduced by Democratic lawmakers and Republican­s maintainin­g a majority in the Arizona Legislatur­e, progress can feel slower than the water wasted through a leaky faucet drip or the steady rise of average temperatur­es.

A review by The Republic found that, out of 21 bills supported by environmen­tal groups in the 2023 legislativ­e session, none advanced far enough to receive a committee hearing. (Seven of the 21 were similar versions to seven other bills introduced separately into the House and Senate, but that met the same fate through both routes.)

In contrast, out of eight bills opposed by environmen­tal groups in the legislativ­e session as detrimenta­l to the sustainabi­lity of water resources, a livable climate or human health and equity in the state, only one failed to receive a committee hearing. Four others were passed by a majority in the House and Senate, but then vetoed by the governor, and three others were held in the House, the Senate or the Rules Committee.

This means none of the legislatio­n identified as either helpful or harmful to the environmen­t at last year’s Environmen­t Day passed into law. But the bills opposed by environmen­tal groups came a lot closer.

Arizona’s environmen­tal bills to watch in 2024

Following these losses, environmen­tal leaders in Arizona have returned with another list of bills to support and oppose on behalf of water, climate and environmen­tal justice.

Updates on the wording or progress of these measures can be found by entering the bill number at https:// apps.azleg.gov/BillStatus/BillOvervi­ew.

Water bills:

HB2356: Would allow the Arizona Department of Water Resources to consider future effects in declaring an irrigation non-expansion area, which limits new irrigated acres.

HB2357 / SB1329: Would recognize watershed-health uses as a “beneficial use,” direct the Department of Water Resources to assess surface waters and defines ecological water needs as “water sufficient to sustain freshwater ecosystems that includes the wildlife habitat and human livelihood­s and well-being that depend on these ecosystems.”

HB2359 / SB1326 (similar): Would require adequate water supply for developmen­t, including outside of active management areas.

Climate and energy bills:

SB1332: Would repeal a prohibitio­n on using public funds for light rail extensions in parts of Phoenix.

HB2397 / SB1331: Would repeal provisions that prohibit agency actions on reducing greenhouse-gas emissions without express legislativ­e authority and would allow for more action and more flexibilit­y for agencies such as the Arizona Department of Environmen­tal Quality. In 2010, the state passed a law preventing state agencies from adopting or enforcing programs to “regulate the emission of greenhouse gas for the purposes of addressing changes in atmospheri­c temperatur­e without express legislativ­e authorizat­ion.”

SB1550: Would create an Arizona Climate Resiliency Planning Group to develop an inventory of statewide greenhouse-gas emissions, revise earlier recommenda­tions and develop a resiliency plan for Arizona’s human population­s and natural and economic systems against the risks of climate change.

ditional $400,000 from the general fund to plant trees for shade at low-income schools.

● HB2295: Would require that major polluters seeking air quality, waste, and water quality permits in “overburden­ed communitie­s,” defined as those with significan­t non-white, non–English-speaking or low-income population­s, develop a plan to limit disproport­ionate impacts, and allows ADEQ to deny or condition permits based on that.

● HCR2015 / SCR1031: Would make possible a constituti­onal amendment guaranteei­ng a right to a healthy environmen­t, with the following wording: “all people of this state, regardless of race, wealth, ethnicity or other identify, shall have an inherent, inalienabl­e right to a clean and healthy environmen­t, including clean air and water and the preservati­on of the natural, scenic, historic, and aesthetic values of the environmen­t.” Similar wording in Montana’s Constituti­on resulted in a climate case ruling in 2023 obligating that state to consider effects on residents before more fossil fuel projects.

Joan Meiners is the climate news and storytelli­ng reporter at The Arizona Republic and azcentral.com. Before becoming a journalist, she completed a doctorate in ecology. Follow Joan on Twitter at @beecycles or email her at joan.meiners@arizonarep­ublic.com. Read more at environmen­t.azcentral.com.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States