The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Registry can help with foreclosur­es

- Michelle Singletary

We know from numerous reports that the housing crisis hit minority families pretty hard. Minority homebuyers by the tens of thousands were trapped in predatory mortgage loans and, as a result, their communitie­s disproport­ionately felt the impact of foreclosur­es.

Now fair housing organizati­ons have filed discrimina­tion complaints with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Developmen­t alleging discrimina­tion in the marketing and maintenanc­e of foreclosed properties in minority neighborho­ods in nine major cities. The banks targeted by the National Fair Housing Alliance and four of its member organizati­ons are U.S. Bank and its parent company, U.S. Bancorp, and Wells Fargo Co.

The complaints were the result of an investigat­ion in which the housing groups said foreclosed properties in predominan­tly white areas were much better maintained than properties in predominan­tly African-american or Latino neighborho­ods.

The groups examined more than 1,000 properties in Georgia, Maryland, Texas, Ohio, Florida, California, Pennsylvan­ia, Arizona and Washington, D.C.

U.S. Bancorp and Wells Fargo have denied discrimina­tion and have questioned whether the properties that got failing marks were even their re- sponsibili­ty to maintain.

“In the vast majority of cases where U.S. Bank is involved in a foreclosur­e, we serve as a trustee for an investment pool where the former mortgage was held, and have no role in servicing or maintainin­g the property,” Nicole GarrisonSp­renger, vice president of corporate public relations, said in a statement. “When we do own a property, we have a strong and comprehens­ive process in place to regularly inspect and maintain properties to marketing standards where we have legal access, regardless of their location.”

Wells Fargo said in a statement that the bank “conducts all lendingand servicing-related activities in a fair and consistent manner without regard to race, and this includes maintenanc­e and marketing standards for all foreclosed properties for which we are responsibl­e. Regrettabl­y, the complaint does not include specific property informatio­n that can allow us to investigat­e the circumstan­ces in any of the markets they list.”

The properties examined by the housing groups were evaluated on a 100-point scale. Points were subtracted for routine maintenanc­e issues that included broken windows and doors, unshoveled snow, overgrown lawns and trash on the property.

While properties in predominan­tly white neighborho­ods “were more likely to have neatly manicured lawns, securely locked doors and attractive ‘for sale’ signs out front, homes in communitie­s of color were more likely to have overgrown yards littered with trash, unsecured doors, broken windows, and in- dications of marketing as a distressed sale,” the report said.

The report noted that properties in communitie­s of color were 42 percent more likely to have more than a dozen maintenanc­e problems when compared to properties in predominan­tly white neighborho­ods.

In many cases, the report added, the deteriorat­ion occurred while properties were under bank ownership and could be attributed to lender neglect.

By allowing inferior maintenanc­e standards for properties in minority communitie­s, the institutio­ns are creating substandar­d communitie­s where values will continue to decline, said Shanna L. Smith, president and chief executive of the National Fair Housing Alliance.

“The investigat­ion did not focus on people who lost their homes, but rather the homeowners living next door to or down the street from the vacant foreclosed property and the impact that poorly maintained foreclosur­e is having on their property values — their homeowners insurance costs, their increased property taxes to make up for the lost tax revenue from the foreclosur­es in their neighborho­od,” Smith said. “It addresses the harm in economic and safety terms for the homeowners left behind in the neighborho­od particular­ly in communitie­s of color.”

Smith added that if banks don’t properly maintain their assets, many of the related expenses become the burden of the local government.

“The local municipali­ty has to mow the lawn and incur costs for nui- sance abatement,” Smith said. “The vacant home with windows opened can encourage vandalism and theft by people outside of the neighborho­od looking to steal appliances, water heaters, HVAC units or copper wiring.”

Here’s why this report is so important. We have to stop saying this isn’t my problem. Encourage your representa­tives to do what the Maryland Legislatur­e has recently done to address the issue of unmaintain­ed vacant and foreclosed properties.

Following the advice of a foreclosur­e task force, the Legislatur­e passed a bill that requires the creation of an Internetba­sed registry that will help communitie­s identify who is responsibl­e for foreclosed properties. Within 30 days after a foreclosur­e sale of a residentia­l property, the purchaser has to submit informatio­n to the registry, including the name, telephone number and street address of the person who is responsibl­e for the maintenanc­e of the property.

A registry can go a long way to help communitie­s and government officials locate the parties responsibl­e for the condition of foreclosed properties. Poorly maintained homes, whether in predominan­tly white or predominan­tly minority neighborho­ods, affect us all.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States