The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

U.S. refuses to sign U.N. treaty

Western nations want to keep unregulate­d nature of Internet. Iran, China, African states seek control.

- Associated Press

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — Envoys from nearly 90 nations signed Friday the first new U.N. telecommun­ications treaty since the Internet age, but the U.S. and other Western nations refused to join after claiming it endorses greater government control over cyberspace.

The head of the U.N. telecoms group pushed back against the American assertions, defending the accord as necessary to help expand online services to poorer nations and add more voices to shape the direction of modern communicat­ions technology.

Hamadoun Toure’s remarks highlighte­d the wide gaps and hard-fought positions during the past 10 days of global talks in Dubai.

The negotiatio­ns essentiall­y pitted the West’s desire to preserve the unregulate­d nature of the Net against developing countries yearning for better Web access and strong-arm states such as Iran and China that closely filter cyberspace.

The final break late Thursday was not over specific regulation­s in the U.N. group’s first telecoms review since before the Internet was a global force. Instead, it came down to an ideologica­l split over the nature of the Internet and who is responsibl­e for its growth and governance.

More than 20 countries joined the U.S. on Friday in refusing to sign the protocols by the U.N.’s Internatio­nal Telecommun­ications Union, or ITU, claiming it opens the door to greater government controls of the Net and could be used by authoritar­ian states to justify further crackdowns on cyberspace.

Rival countries — including Iran, China and African states — insist the government­s should have a greater sway over Internet affairs and seek to break a perceived Western grip on informatio­n technology. They also favor greater internatio­nal help to bring reliable online links to the world’s least-developed regions.

The ITU — which dates to the age of the telegraph in the mid19th century — has no technical powers to change how the Internet operates or force countries to follow its nonbinding accords, which also dealt with issues such as mobile phone roaming rates and internatio­nal emergency numbers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States