The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

New plan for failing schools

Governor proposes state authority to seize control of local facilities.

- By Greg Bluestein, Jaime Sarrio and Kristina Torres Staff writers

More than 100 of Georgia’s most troubled schools could face state takeover under a plan unveiled Wednesday by Gov. Nathan Deal that would give his office unpreceden­ted new powers over local schools.

The plan would create a statewide “Opportunit­y School District” with authority to seize control of schools deemed to be perenniall­y failing. The state would have total authority over the schools put into the special district and could remove principals and teachers, change what students are learning and control the schools’ budgets.

Deal’s office estimates 141 schools would be eligible,

including more than 60 in metro Atlanta. The plan would allow the state to run schools, close them, partner with local school districts to run them or convert them into charter schools. The special district would be overseen by a new superinten­dent who would report directly to the governor.

It is the governor’s signature education proposal of the year, and comes after weeks of “listening sessions” with skeptical legislator­s. They would have to pass the initiative overwhelmi­ngly for it to be put to voters on the 2016 ballot. The governor has framed it as a constituti­onal amendment, which requires two-thirds support in the House and the Senate. That means he’ll need to hold most Republican­s, who have commanding majorities in both chambers, and lure a few Democrats to pass the measure.

“When we talk about helping failing schools, we’re talking about rescuing children,” said Deal. “I stand firm on the principle that every child can learn, and I stand equally firm in the belief that the status quo isn’t working.”

The plan defines “persistent­ly failing schools” that would be targeted as those scoring below 60 for three years in a row on the College and Career Performanc­e Index — the state’s annual report card for school performanc­e. Annual enrollment in the program would be capped at 20 schools a year.

Under the current plan, 27 Atlanta Public Schools would be eligible, more than any other district in the state. DeKalb is close behind with 26. Fulton has seven and Clayton three. Two state-approved charter schools are on the list of low performers as well. No schools from Cobb or Gwinnett are on the list.

Atlanta Superinten­dent Meria Carstarphe­n said in a statement the district is already making changes it hopes will improve student performanc­e.

“We hope that through building trusting, collaborat­ive relationsh­ips with our communitie­s, APS will be able to achieve positive outcomes for our students without state interventi­on,” she said.

Opposition to the plan is already mounting. Democrats say they plan to release their own plan to tackle failing schools Monday. Senate Minority Leader Steve Henson, D-Tucker, called it an “educationa­l mirage” and called for an increase in school funding after years of billions of dollars in austerity cuts to education.

“Yes, we have a problem with failing schools, and yes, we need to correct the problem,” he said. “But we don’t accomplish this by privatizin­g the public school system, denying equal education to all Georgia students and by refusing to address the fact that we have short-changed our state education system by $8 billion over the past 12 years.”

The Opportunit­y School District would be capped at 100 schools overall. Schools would stay in the district for a minimum of five years and not more than 10 years. Those provisions aim to address critics who worry the proposal gives the governor’s office too much power and includes no exit plan for schools that recover.

Some families of students at long-struggling schools cheered the new plan. Priscilla Davenport said her daughter, who attends DeKalb’s McNair High School, would bolt to another school in a heartbeat if not for the college program she’s taking at Georgia State University.

“It’s frustratin­g,” said Davenport. “I’ve been frustrated for years at McNair’s performanc­e. And I haven’t seen any change. It’s time for a new approach.”

The legislatio­n comes as Deal has put off other campaign promises, such as a vow to overhaul the 30-year-old educa- tion funding formula, until next year. His staff has met legislator­s to let them air their concerns, and he plans to lead a bipartisan delegation this month to Louisiana, which has a similar statewide plan.

Still, it’s been a slow rollout for the plan, introduced more than a quarter of the way through a 40-day legislativ­e session that’s expected to end April 2. On Wednesday, lawmakers in both the House and Senate heard for the first time about how similar state-run districts are performing in Louisiana and Tennessee.

Opposition, meanwhile, has built up during the runup to the bill’s formal introducti­on.

Tim Callahan, spokesman for the Profession­al Associatio­n of Georgia Educators, the state’s largest teacher advocacy group, said, “We are certainly open to the discussion but we remain concerned that this concept may not lend itself to Georgia and that simply changing the administra­tive structures and management of schools filled with impoverish­ed students struggling to learn does little to address the root causes of their struggles.”

Superinten­dent Richard Woods, whose office could be marginaliz­ed by the move, declined comment Wednesday but has hinted at his discomfort. And some lawmakers from both parties are wary of giving the state broad new powers.

The measure’s chief supporters, though, said a school rescue plan is long overdue. State Sen. Butch Miller, R-Gainesvill­e, said a bold approach is sorely needed.

“It’s not a one-size-fits-all,” said Miller, who sponsored the

‘I’ve been frustrated for years at McNair’s performanc­e. And I haven’t seen any change.’ Priscilla Davenport Mother of student at McNair High

bill. “You would have a different address, a different business plan for each individual school. And I would say to those educators who might push back and challenge this that, if they know what to do, why aren’t they doing it?”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States