The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

In the past year, DeKalb has “attracted and retained more than 2,300 jobs.”

- By April Hunt ahunt@ajc.com

— Interim DeKalb County CEO Lee May in the State of the County address, Jan. 22,

In the past year, DeKalb has “attracted and retained more than 2,300 jobs.” Interim DeKalb County CEO Lee May Lee May in the State of the County address, Jan. 22, 2015

With economic indicators ticking up in Georgia and headlines of new jobs coming to metro Atlanta, the state’s third-largest county is touting its successes.

DeKalb County has “attracted and retained more than 2,300 jobs” in the last year, in- terim CEO Lee May told business and community leaders during his State of the County address last month.

May went on to describe his efforts to improve the county’s image to attract businesses and support job growth.

But PolitiFact Georgia wondered: Could the

county often in the news for corruption allegation­s and political gridlock also be responsibl­e for growing jobs?

May directed us to DeKalb Workforce Developmen­t, the local agency that provides “one-stop” education, training and employment programs under the federal Workforce Investment Act.

The agency keeps track of jobs in several categories, said Workforce Director Sheryl Stone. They are: 1) Geographic Solutions: A statewide database that counts only fulltime employees hired or retained through federal Department of Labor funds. In 2014, DeKalb saw 731 new hires in this category and 602 people who retained new jobs for at least a year. Total: 1,333.

2) Capital Improvemen­t Plan (CIP): A count of workers hired or retained, either part-time or full-time, as part of DeKalb’s $1.35 billion overhaul of its water/ sewer system. Last year, 107 people were hired and 386 saw jobs retained as part of working for contractor­s on the program. Total: 493.

3) Taleo: Employers who work on the county level to recruit for parttime and full-time jobs use DeKalb’s Taleo system to filter resumes. Some workers will transfer to the state Geographic Solutions system once they have completed probationa­ry periods for fulltime work. The county does not break out the number of jobs based on full-time or part-time in this category, but all are unsubsidiz­ed with government dollars. Total: 348.

4) Job training: Workforce uses federal dollars to subsidize up to half of a new hire’s salary for 90 days. The employer recruits through the agency and must hire the employee at full time with benefits. The subsidy is designed to serve as a training cost. Total: 167.

Stone said the agency determined that, over a 10-year period, the aver- age salary for workers it helped find employment was $56,000.

And, adding up the categories, Workforce counts 2,341 people working for the year.

That would fully support May’s claim, except for hiccups with the counts themselves.

The local Taleo category counts part-time jobs as equal to those with fulltime hours (which the county considers after only 32 hours). Job seekers are apt to view even 32 hours per week to be part-time, suggesting that category is inflated.

The bigger question is how Workforce is counting workers in the water/ sewer overhaul. Stone said the agency counts workers as reported by the contractor­s selected for different projects.

Some of those people may work only a few days or months on a specific task, Stone said, but they are included in the total headcount reported.

The agency’s lead over the CIP said each worker is only counted once.

And, if someone is hired or keeps a job for three months, that person then counts as a fulltime equivalent worker.

That’s problemati­c, because the definition­s can affect the counts, said Tom Smith, a finance professor at the Goizueta Business School at Emory University.

For instance, a pizzeria can claim to have sold a pizza for every 8 slices it sells. But those slices may not come from the same whole pizza — meaning the count doesn’t adjust for what would have been thrown away from one whole pizza that had been divvied up.

“Four thousand people who work a quarter of the year is not really the same thing as 1,000 jobs,” Smith said.

Barbara Neuby, a professor of political science at Kennesaw State University, said the massaged definition­s also direct focus away from statistics that may not be as positive.

State Department of Labor figures show that the number of new unemployme­nt claims in DeKalb were down about 12 percent between December 2013 and Decem- ber 2014.

But the claims are up 44 percent between November and December last year.

“If they wanted to be truly accountabl­e and transparen­t, they could say they created work in the private sector by issuing contracts,” said Neuby, who specialize­s in government budgets and finance. “But to say these are jobs created, no. We don’t have exact numbers to make that claim.”

May said the county plans to do a better job of counting positions in that category going forward.

But, he notes that the work is creating jobs.

“We spent $62 million on the CIP last year, and that translates into people who are working,” May said. “To us, a job is a job if you’re working, it counts.”

To that end, May is correct. The state Labor Department defines a job simply as a task that is performed.

The number of people employed to do that task can be less than full time, or more.

So, was May on target when he said DeKalb had created or kept more than 2,300 jobs last year?

By the state’s broad definition­s, the county’s Workforce Developmen­t office backs him up on the number of people working. That’s not the same thing as the number of jobs.

The distinctio­n boils down to that difference. Looking at the categories, the bulk of the people being counted are likely to be the same as the number of jobs.

But for some people working part-time on the local level, or in the CIP, the distinctio­n could boost or underestim­ate the actual number of jobs.

Without more data, which the county does not collect, we don’t know what is happening.

May’s statement is mostly right, except for problems the county acknowledg­es in its counts.

We rate the statement Mostly True.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States