The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Active shooter training sporadic

Many unaware of what to do if shots fired on campus.

- By Lisa Leff and Ryan J. Foley

Eight years after the Virginia Tech massacre led to tighter security at colleges across the U.S., some schools make “active shooter” training mandatory for incoming students, while others offer little more than brief online guidance on what to do if there’s a gunman on the loose.

Yet another shooting rampage on Friday resulted in the deaths of nine people, plus the shooter, at an Oregon community college Oct. 1. On Friday, there was more bloodshed, with one person killed and three wounded at an Arizona university and another fatal shooting of a student near a Texas college.

At some institutio­ns, such as the Colorado School of Mines and Arkansas State University, training on how to respond to an armed intruder has become as much a part of fall orientatio­n as lessons on alcohol abuse. Students hear presentati­ons covering their options, such as running, hiding or fighting back.

Other schools have purely voluntary training. Or they put informatio­n on what to do in an emergency on websites, where it can easily be overlooked by students and staff members. Many public college and university systems leave it up to their individual campuses to draw up emergency plans and decide what level of training, if any, to give employees and students.

In the wake of the recent violence, some professors, students and administra­tors are asking whether schools need to do more to deliver potentiall­y life-saving messages to those on campus.

The challenges are particular­ly acute at twoyear community colleges, which often do not have their own police forces to conduct training exercises for staff and students. They also tend to have lots of older, working students who can be hard to reach.

“That it’s actually happened recently with the frequency and danger it has, I think everyone is frightened and asking a lot of questions about how well-prepared we would be as a campus,” said David Morse, an Eng- lish instructor who is president of the Academic Senate for California’s 113 community colleges.

The 2007 slaughter of 32 people by a student at Virginia Tech prompted Congress to require colleges and universiti­es to adopt procedures for notifying the campus of any immediate threat. Under the law, schools also must publicize their emergency response plans “in a manner designed to reach students and staff.”

A review of schools in 40 states across the country shows most have set up sophistica­ted alert systems that use text messages, social media or technology that can remotely take over computers tied to campus servers. Many also have added armed officers, con- ducted drills with law enforcemen­t authoritie­s and created threat-assessment teams that try to determine whether an overheard remark or violenceti­nged essay is a genuine danger sign.

Some of these measures are credited with saving lives. When a gunman shot students at a Florida State University library a year ago, campus police responded within minutes of the first 911 call and fired a barrage of bullets that killed him. Less than two weeks before, the police had participat­ed in active shooter training that included a scenario with a gunman at the library.

Umpqua Community College, site of the Oregon mass shooting, also did many things to prepare, and experts said its efforts may well have prevented an even larger loss of life.

A small, rural school, Umpqua didn’t have its own police force, but administra­tors had brought in local law enforcemen­t officers so they would be familiar with the layout of campus. Professors and staff regularly discussed how they should respond if someone started shooting, and where in their buildings would be safest to hunker down. The school also had emergency notificati­on and lockdown procedures in place.

But in general, educating students and employees about what to do in the event of an attack has proved something of a stumbling block. While most schools have created posters, brochures and online guides, some of them have yet to figure out how to get people to read, much less absorb, the material.

Richard Turton, chairman of West Virginia University’s Faculty Senate, said he wasn’t familiar with his school’s active shooter plan until a reporter’s question prompted him to do some digging. He found a PowerPoint presentati­on and videos on the university’s website.

“I would suspect many faculty who are very busy would tend to not look at those things unless they’re sort of prompted several times,” Turton said.

Matt Barnes, 30, a civil engineerin­g student who just transferre­d to the University of Minnesota’s Twin Cities campus, received a booklet during orientatio­n that outlined the school’s emergency notificati­on procedures. He realized it didn’t mention anything about an ac- tive shooter situation.

Barnes said he gets emails any time there is a crime on campus with details about the incident. But he said he’s not sure what he’s supposed to do if something happens in a building where he happens to be.

University spokesman Steve Henneberry confirmed the booklet doesn’t specifical­ly mention active shooter situations and said it was written from an “all-hazards planning point of view.”

On some campuses, some of the advice itself isn’t detailed or even particular­ly helpful.

The website of 20,000student Kirkwood Community College in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, advises students that if a shooter or sniper strikes, “listen for instructio­ns from authoritie­s such as whether to remain inside or to evacuate.” Campus security director Melissa Jensen said more specific training videos are available.

The instructio­ns can vary from campus to campus. Many schools have adopted the run, hide or fight-back training developed by the city of Houston and promoted by the FBI. Others have embraced the procedures developed by the I Love U Guys Foundation, which urges students to lock themselves in classrooms if it all possible.

At Arkansas State University in Jonesboro, the active shooter training that is mandatory for new students is voluntary for the faculty.

“How many faculty have availed themselves of these trainings? Unfortunat­ely, the answer is not many,” said Greg Phillips, chairman of the Faculty Senate, which will take up the issue during the coming week.

 ?? MARK DUNCAN / AP FILE 2013 ?? A 2015 review finds that eight years after the Virginia Tech massacre led to tighter security at U.S. colleges, some schools make “active shooter” training mandatory for incoming students, and others leave policies up to schools to develop.
MARK DUNCAN / AP FILE 2013 A 2015 review finds that eight years after the Virginia Tech massacre led to tighter security at U.S. colleges, some schools make “active shooter” training mandatory for incoming students, and others leave policies up to schools to develop.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States