The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Education official: Test opt-out bill may help cheaters

Children could refuse to take exams for medical reasons.

- By Ty Tagami ttagami@ajc.com Tests

Legislatio­n that lets schoolchil­dren refuse to take mandatory state tests for medical reasons could open the door to cheating, one top educationa­l ethics enforcemen­t official warned.

Kelly Henson, leader of Georgia’s teacher credential­ing agency, said that if Gov. Nathan Deal signs Senate Bill 355, school officials could be protected if they encourage parents of low-performing students to keep their kids home on testing days.

“It’s not an improbable scenario that, at least in some places, there would be a concerted and organized effort to encourage certain parents to opt out,” said Henson, the executive secretary of the Georgia Profession­al Standards Commission, which pursues sanctions against school employees for unethical behavior.

Schools are judged on their test results, so the temptation would be there, Henson told his commission­ers at their meeting Thursday.

The bill’s author, Sen. William T. Ligon Jr., R-Brunswick, said it’s a stretch to imagine such abuse, since doctors and parents, rather than schools, would be making the opt-out decisions.

The legislatio­n, adopted at the end of the just-finished legislativ­e session, allows children to refuse mandatory state tests under two conditions: a diagnosis of a life-threatenin­g or serious health condition or an excuse from a therapist or doctor.

“I think they’re looking for a problem where there is none,” Ligon said.

Henson, who has been a superinten­dent and a school principal, said that in his experience getting a doctor to sign a note is easy. To him, it seems obviously unethical to encourage parents of struggling students to opt out, yet he said SB 355 contains a potential loophole with this sentence: “A teacher, principal, assistant principal, school, or local school system shall not be penalized for any such child who does not participat­e in such assessment­s.”

Ligon said that language was inserted out of concern about any

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States