The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

GOP’s metro transit plan moves on down the track

- Kyle Wingfield

The biggest shift in recent years among Georgia’s GOP lawmakers may be their attitude toward mass transit. And their train of thought on the subject is approachin­g its destinatio­n.

In 2010, Republican­s’ angst about MARTA nearly derailed the bill that brought us the ill-fated T-SPLOST. Now their questions are more about how to deliver transit service across metro Atlanta and who should oversee it.

That last bit about governance is what’s enthralled them lately. Both the state House and the Senate this year fielded study committees on the topic as the state moves slowly toward a more significan­t role in regional transit. Before legislator­s loosen the purse strings, they want to strengthen their control over how and where the money is spent.

Don’t expect a bill to settle the matter in the coming legislativ­e session. But the outlines of a plan are taking shape.

First, the usual framing of this issue — “When will voters in (Cobb/Gwinnett/fillin-the-blank county) decide to let MARTA in?” — is due for a serious update. While a major reason for Republican­s’ warming to transit is the vast progress the transit agency has made under the leadership of Keith Parker and the current board, the irony is MARTA may not be the primary driver of transit expansion to the suburbs.

This owes in part to lawmakers’ continued belief suburbanit­es won’t embrace the MARTA brand. Many of the negative perception­s Parker and Co. have addressed, from low service levels to high crime rates, persist outside the agency’s three-county footprint. There’s a feeling it would be easier to sell these voters on transit under a different name than to educate them about MARTA’s improvemen­ts.

The feeling may be mutual. MARTA leadership has expressed its lack of interest in a “shotgun wedding” with the suburbs. That doesn’t mean MARTA wouldn’t go if asked and embraced. But it has enough on its plate, especially with Atlantans’ approval of a 0.5 percent sales tax to fund expansion in the city, that it won’t go begging for an invitation.

Taken together, these are good reasons to expect regional transit leadership to be housed elsewhere. As it happens, the state has a candidate waiting in the wings: the Georgia Regional Transporta­tion Authority, or GRTA.

GRTA already operates the Xpress commuter bus service from nine metro counties outside the MARTA service area. Its role in regional transit will only grow with the planned network of tolled express lanes, which will guarantee reliable trip times and give free access to transit buses.

The exact nature of GRTA’s role — running a regional network itself, merely coordinati­ng among existing transit agencies, or something in between — is still up for discussion. That’s the biggest reason not to expect a bill in 2017. Legislator­s are more likely to hire a consultant to sketch out options, including who would run what and what needs to be built and how much it would cost.

One possibilit­y: MARTA continues to operate in Fulton, DeKalb and Clayton, while GRTA serves people commuting to (or from) those counties or between suburbs. Cobb and Gwinnett decide whether to continue operating their own services or to contract with GRTA or MARTA. All of it operates under a single system for paying fares and making transfers.

The structural questions lawmakers are wrestling with are important. But all commuters want are choices that are clear, reliable and affordable (both in user fees and taxes). That’s the ultimate destinatio­n.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States