The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Experts: Quickly built span safe

Accelerate­d schedule, quick-curing concrete help rebuilt I-85 bridge open month ahead of schedule.

- By David Wickert dwickert@ajc.com

Six weeks ago, an elevated highway that carried hundreds of thousands of people a day lay in smoking ruins, and metro Atlanta residents despaired at what surely would be months of punishing commutes.

This weekend, the state opened all lanes on the rebuilt section of I-85, a full month ahead of schedule — leaving commuters to marvel at what looked like an engineerin­g and constructi­on miracle.

Cars began traveling the northbound lanes again Friday night. The southbound lanes followed, reopening Saturday night.

But experts say it’s no miracle. In fact, “accelerate­d bridge constructi­on” isn’t even unusual. What’s more, it’s perfectly safe and should be used more often, they say.

“Once the public sees it, they will demand it,” said Atorod Azizinamin­i, chairman of the civil and environmen­tal engineerin­g department at Florida Internatio­nal University. “‘Why don’t they do that with every bridge?’”

The Georgia Department of Transporta­tion has used accelerate­d constructi­on techniques before and likely will again. But the I-85 project is by far the largest such project it has undertaken.

The highway went up in flames and collapsed near Piedmont Road on March 30. A homeless man, Basil Eleby, has been charged with setting the blaze, which then spread to constructi­on material GDOT stored beneath the highway.

Georgia’s quick response began

before the blaze was even extinguish­ed. That night, engineers began reviewing plans for the original bridge. Within a few days, they completed design of the new one.

The state enlisted contractor C.W. Matthews, which began working without a contract. But the eventual deal they signed played a big role in the pace of constructi­on: The contractor stands to earn $3.1 million in incentives for finishing a month before the original June 15 completion date.

GDOT constructi­on director Marc Mastronard­i told the House Transporta­tion Committee last week those incentives inspired the 24-hour, seven-day work schedule C.W. Matthews has maintained since the work began.

Good weather and quick-curing concrete also sped constructi­on. So did good luck — the original bridge’s foundation was not damaged in the fire, and workers were able to shore up the 13 existing columns.

Mastronard­i told The Atlanta Journal-Constituti­on that extra manpower allowed C.W. Matthews to do a variety of work simultaneo­usly — a key to accelerate­d constructi­on.

The fast pace comes at a price. The I-85 constructi­on project will cost up to $16.6 million, most of that federal money. Mastronard­i said it’s difficult to tell how much it would have cost under a normal constructi­on timetable. But one indication: The quick-curing concrete costs about twice as much as the typical concrete used in road constructi­on.

But constructi­on cost wasn’t the only factor. State officials say getting the bridge done early will have a positive economic impact of $27 million, including the cost of workers’ time while they were stuck in traffic.

Azizinamin­i said that kind of broader savings is one reason accelerate­d bridge constructi­on has become more common over the last decade. In 2011, Massachuse­tts replaced 14 bridges over 10 weekends. In fact, he said it’s hard to find a state that hasn’t used such techniques.

Georgia, too, has used accelerate­d constructi­on techniques. One example: the Ga. 299 bridge over I-24 in Dade County in North Georgia. After building the new bridge nearby, the state will demolish the old bridge and set the new one in place this weekend, minimizing traffic disruption.

Because its collapse disrupted the lives of hundreds of thousands of commuters, the quick I-85 reconstruc­tion has gained far more attention — and some questions about whether the bridge is safe.

Mastronard­i said GDOT has had inspectors at the site 24 hours a day. They have monitored the constructi­on and tested the concrete used to build the new bridge. They even inspected and approved each of the 61 concrete beams as they were manufactur­ed.

Mastronard­i said the speed of I-85 constructi­on is “not a matter of anybody doing something inferior or cutting a corner.”

Azizinamin­i said accelerate­d bridge constructi­on is safe. And he thinks it should be used more often.

“It should be done fast,” he said. “Disruption to the traffic should not be there. We have the technology that we can replace a bridge in a matter of hours or a weekend.”

 ?? DAVID BARNES / DAVID.BARNES@AJC.COM ?? Cars pass along Piedmont Road on Saturday under the section of I-85 that collapsed in a fire March 30. Repairs to the roadway were completed in six weeks.
DAVID BARNES / DAVID.BARNES@AJC.COM Cars pass along Piedmont Road on Saturday under the section of I-85 that collapsed in a fire March 30. Repairs to the roadway were completed in six weeks.
 ?? DAVID BARNES / AJC ?? A constructi­on crew collects barriers along I-85 southbound Saturday before the roadway reopened. The northbound part reopened Friday evening.
DAVID BARNES / AJC A constructi­on crew collects barriers along I-85 southbound Saturday before the roadway reopened. The northbound part reopened Friday evening.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States