The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

New worker, trainer need to build understand­ing of learning styles

Asking for specific steps may make learning process a bit easier.

- By Marie G. McIntyre Tribune News Service Marie G. McIntyre is a workplace coach and the author of“Secrets to Winning at Office Politics.”

Q: I recently got a new job and am having some issues with the person training me. “Tammy” inundates me with waves of informatio­n, most of which seems completely unnecessar­y. I have trouble fitting everything together, so the entire process has become very frustratin­g.

Tammy and I got along well before she became my trainer, but now her attitude has changed. Although she’s bright and bubbly with our co-workers, around me she seems irritated and sullen. She often remarks that my training should be moving faster.

To understand this job, I need more specific direction and less general informatio­n. How can I get the training I need without upsetting Tammy?

A: Based on your descriptio­n, you and Tammy may simply have different learning styles. When tackling a new assignment, some people are “doers,” while others are “thinkers.”

“Doers” want to focus on the specific detailed steps required to carry out their task. Being hands-on learners, they are usually eager to jump right into the work. Extended discussion seems like a pointless waste of time.

“Thinkers” are less interested in implementa­tion steps and more concerned with seeing the bigger picture. Because they work best when they understand the context, they want to get as much informatio­n as possible.

Trainers automatica­lly favor the approach that works for them, so when a trainee has the opposite style, frustratio­n can build on both sides. While Tammy is trying to provide helpful background, you are starving for explicit details. As often happens, you are each beginning to conclude that the other is inept.

Instead of criticizin­g Tammy’s teaching methods, try to politely ask for what you need. For example: “Tammy, I really appreciate all your help with my training. At this point, I believe I understand the overall process, but I may not be clear on the exact steps. If I make a list of specific questions, could we spend some time reviewing them?”

Should this approach fail, consider asking a colleague with a more compatible style to provide some informal coaching. Just be sure to avoid making disparagin­g comments about your official trainer. Q: My boss said he recommende­d me for a raise of 50 cents per hour, but when I received my paycheck, the increase was for only 25 cents. To make it worse, I learned that my new co-worker was given a 75-cent raise, which seems very unfair.

This co-worker was just hired 10 months ago, while I’ve been here for four years. When I asked my manager about this, he just mumbled something about company pay policies. Doesn’t this seem wrong?

A: First of all, your boss should never have mentioned a specific increase amount unless he was absolutely certain it had been approved. By sharing this informatio­n prematurel­y, he made your raise a disappoint­ment instead of a pleasure.

As for the disparity with your colleague, seniority is only one factor considered in calculatin­g pay increases. Others may include position in pay range, salary caps or performanc­e ratings. To understand the process in your own company, ask the human resources manager. But don’t inquire about your co-worker’s pay because that informatio­n is confidenti­al.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States