The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Wells Fargo settles lawsuit for $108M

Bank had been accused of charging fraudulent fees on VA home loans.

- By Russell Grantham rgrantham@ajc.com

Wells Fargo & Co. has agreed to pay $108 million to the federal government to settle two metro Atlanta whistleblo­wers’ allegation­s that the bank charged fraudulent fees on veterans’ home refinancin­g loans.

The settlement award, announced by an Atlanta firm representi­ng the whistleblo­wers, is the largest so far to result from the 11-year-old lawsuit. Two former metro Atlanta mortgage brokers sued eight banks or mortgage lenders on behalf of the government. The lawsuit was filed in federal district court in Atlanta.

“We’re glad its over, at least as to Wells Fargo,” said one of the two whistleblo­wers, Victor Bibby. The second is Brian Donnelly.

In 2012, SunTrust Banks, JP Morgan Chase, Countrywid­e Home Loans and three other major lenders agreed to pay $162 million to settle similar allegation­s by the whistleblo­wers.

Another lawsuit is pending against a St. Petersburg, Fla., lender, Mortgage Investors Corp. In 2013, the lender laid off hundreds of employees and stopped making new home loans, blaming tougher regulation­s under the federal Dodd-Frank Act.

A Wells Fargo spokeswoma­n said the bank changed its methods for handling Veterans Administra­tion refinancin­g loans several years ago to fix the alleged problems and settled the lawsuit to “put the matter behind us.”

The San Francisco bank, metro Atlanta’s second largest in total deposits, has been bruised lately in a number of legal skirmishes over its practices.

Last year, the federal Consumer

Financial Protection Bureau and other agencies alleged that the bank’s employees broke the law by opening more than 2 million credit card, checking and savings accounts without customers’ knowledge, in order to meet sales quotas and win bonuses.

Last month, Wells Fargo said it would refund customers after admitting that about 570,000 borrowers may have been wrongly pushed into auto insurance policies that they didn’t need.

In the Atlanta whistleblo­wer case, which affected veteran homeowners across the nation, Bibby and Donnelly alleged that Wells Fargo illegally collected lawyers’ fees and closing costs from borrowers who refinanced their mortgages, even though such charges were barred under the VA’s refinancin­g program.

The bank hid the fees by mislabelin­g them, according to Atlanta law firm Butler Wooten & Peak, one of three firms that represente­d the whistleblo­wers.

The law firm said taxpayers also lost money due to the alleged fraud. Under the VA loan guarantee program, the agency paid Wells Fargo a portion of any loans on which the borrowers defaulted, even though the fraudulent fees would have negated the government loan guarantees.

Wells Fargo spokeswoma­n Crystal Drake said, “Today, we are settling this longstandi­ng lawsuit, which did not seek any refunds for individual veterans, in order to put the matter behind us, and to focus on restoring trust in Wells Fargo.”

She said the bank had previously made compensati­on available to affected veterans.

“More than six years ago,” she added, “when questions about fees on certain Veterans Administra­tion refinance loans were raised, we resolved those concerns by improving our internal controls to ensure that veteran customers only pay appropriat­e fees on refinances.”

Under the federal whistleblo­wer’s act, known as the Federal False Claims Act, people with knowledge of wrongdoing by a company can sue on behalf of the government, and collect up to 30 percent of any resulting settlement or jury award.

“Ultimately the government decided not to participat­e” in the lawsuit, Butler Wooten said in a press release.

Jim Butler, with Butler Wooten, said the whistleblo­wers’ share of the $270 million in total settlement­s with the seven lenders is still being negotiated with the federal Justice Department.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States