The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

White House, Wall St. cheer class-action vote

Financial-dispute lawsuits dealt blow in Senate measure.

- By Kevin Freking

WASHINGTON — The White House is welcoming a congressio­nal measure killing the ability of millions of Americans to band together to sue bank or credit card companies to resolve financial disputes, in a major win for Wall Street.

The Senate narrowly voted late Tuesday night to nullify the rule, with Vice President Mike Pence casting the final vote to break a 50-50 tie. The measure now goes to President Donald Trump for his signature.

“President Donald J. Trump applauds the Congress for passing” the resolution, the White House said in a statement shortly after the vote that highlighte­d its own Treasury Department report criticizin­g the rule. “The rule would harm our community banks and credit unions by opening the door to frivolous lawsuits by special interest trial lawyers.”

The banking industry had been lobbying hard to roll back the regulation from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The bureau had moved to ban most types of mandatory arbitratio­n clauses found in the fine print of agreements consumers often enter into when opening a checking account or getting a credit card.

The vote reflects the effort of the Trump administra­tion and congressio­nal Republican­s to undo regulation­s that the GOP argues harm the free market.

Democratic lawmakers said the CFPB’s rule would have given consumers more leverage to stop companies “Tonight’s vote is a giant setback for every consumer in this country,” said Richard Cordray, director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, about Tuesday’s action in the Senate.

from financial wrongdoing. They cited the sales practices at Wells Fargo and the security breach at credit company Equifax as examples of misdeeds protected through forced arbitratio­n.

“So who does forced arbitratio­n help? Wall Street banks and other huge corporatio­ns that never pay the price for cheating working people,” said Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio.

Richard Cordray, director of the consumer bureau, said: “Tonight’s vote is a giant setback for every consumer in this country. Wall Street won and ordinary people lost. This vote means the courtroom doors will remain closed for groups of people seeking justice and relief when they are wronged by a company.”

Republican­s said the arbitratio­n system has worked wonderfull­y for consumers. They said the payouts for the average consumer in arbitratio­n cases are generally much larger and come more quickly than when compared to the relief gained through class-action lawsuits.

“The effort to try to characteri­ze this as some devious system that has been

created to try to stop consumers from having access to fairness is simply false,” said Sen. Mike Crapo, the Republican chairman of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee. “We have a very fair system that has been working for over 100 years in this country.”

Crapo said the average pay-out for consumers in class-action lawsuits against financial companies was just $32, but lawyers stood to make millions.

Democrats argued that consumers generally don’t have the time and means to pursue claims in arbitratio­n, and since most disputes revolve around small amounts, they typically just give up. They said banks and other financial firms know that in the end they won’t have pay a real price for taking advantage of a consumer.

But class-actions would serve as a powerful tool for consumers, they said.

“Once again, we’re helping the powerful against the powerless,” said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., as the Senate neared the vote, sensing the Democrats would lose.

 ?? ANDREW MANGUM / THE NEW YORK TIMES ??
ANDREW MANGUM / THE NEW YORK TIMES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States