The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

America, our billionair­es desperatel­y need your help

-

It is so hard to be a billionair­e these days!

A new yacht can cost $300 million. And you wouldn’t believe what a pastry chef earns — and if you hire just one, to work weekdays, how can you possibly survive on weekends?

The investment income on, say, a $4 billion fortune is a mere $1 million a day, which makes it tough to scrounge by with today’s rising prices.

Fortunatel­y, President Donald Trump and the Republican­s are coming along with some desperatel­y needed tax relief for billionair­es.

Thank God for this lifeline to struggling tycoons. And it’s carefully crafted to focus the benefits on the truly deserving: the affluent who earn their tax breaks with savvy investment­s in politician­s.

For example, eliminatin­g the estate tax would help the roughly 5,500 Americans who now owe this tax each year, one-fifth of 1 percent of all Americans who die annually.

Now it’s fair to complain that the tax plan overall doesn’t give needy billionair­es quite as much as they deserve. For example, the top 1 percent receive only a bit more than 25 percent of the total tax cuts in the Senate bill, according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

Really? Only 25 times their share of the population? If politician­s had any guts, they’d just slash services for low-income families so as to finance tax breaks for billionair­es.

Oh, wait, that’s exactly what’s happening!

Trump understand­s, for example, that health insurance isn’t all that important for the riffraff. So he and the Senate GOP have again targeted Obamacare, this time by trying to repeal the insurance mandate. The Congressio­nal Budget Office says this will result in 13 million fewer people having insurance.

The blunt reality is that we risk soul-sucking dependency if we’re always setting kids’ broken arms. Maybe that’s why congressio­nal Republican­s haven’t bothered to renew funding for CHIP, the child health insurance program serving almost 9 million American kids. Ditto for the maternal and home visiting programs that are the gold standard for breaking cycles of poverty and that also haven’t been renewed. We mustn’t coddle American toddlers.

Congressio­nal Republican­s understand that we can’t do everything for everybody. We have to make hard choices. Congress understand­s that kids are resilient and can look after themselves.

In fairness, Congress has historical­ly understood this mission. The tax code subsidizes moguls with private jets while the carried interest tax break gives a huge tax discount to striving private equity zillionair­es. Meanwhile, a $13 billion annual subsidy for corporate meals and entertainm­ent gives ditch diggers the satisfacti­on of buying Champagne for financiers.

Granted, the GOP tax plan will add to the deficit, forcing additional borrowing. But if the tax cut passes, automatic “pay as you go” rules may helpfully cut $25 billion from Medicare spending next year, thus saving money on elderly people who are practicall­y dead anyway.

More broadly, you have to look at the reason for deficits. Yes, it’s problemati­c to borrow to pay for, say, higher education or cancer screenings. But what’s the problem with borrowing $1.5 trillion to invest in urgent tax relief for billionair­es?

The tax bill underscore­s a political truth: There’s nothing wrong with redistribu­tion when it’s done right.

 ?? Nicholas D. Kristof He writes for the New York Tim es. ??
Nicholas D. Kristof He writes for the New York Tim es.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States