The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

FEDERAL LAWSUIT

OXENDINE FIGHTS CHARGES FILED BY ETHICS BOARD

- By James Salzer

Former Georgia Insurance Commission­er John Oxendine has filed a federal lawsuit against the state ethics commission saying its newest charges against him — that he illegally benefited personally from campaign funds raised for his unsuccessf­ul 2010 gubernator­ial run — stem from an unconstitu­tionally vague state law.

Oxendine has been battling ethics complaints since a year before he lost the 2010 Republican gubernator­ial primary after being the race’s one-time front-runner.

Following an Atlanta Journal-Constituti­on report, a complaint was filed in 2009 accusing two insurance companies of funneling $120,000 in illegal contributi­ons to Oxendine’s campaign.

An ethics complaint against the insurers accused of giving the money to Oxendine was dismissed in 2014 because the ethics commission’s staff had made so little progress on it. But the commission didn’t dismiss charges against Oxendine, the recipient of the donations.

The case remained largely dormant until the AJC reported in 2015 that Oxendine failed to return more than $500,000 worth of leftover contributi­ons from his gubernator­ial bid and that he spent money raised for Republican runoff and general election campaigns that he never ran because he lost in the GOP primary.

Oxendine amended his reports in October 2015 to show more than $700,000 left over, including $237,000 in loans to his law firm, which he repaid with $8,700 worth of interest.

Following the AJC report, ethics commission staffers filed an amended complaint, accusing him of improperly spending more than $208,000 raised for the runoff and general elections and accepting more than the legal limit in contributi­ons from 19 donors.

The commission dismissed many of the charges in December 2015 after Oxendine’s campaign lawyer, Douglas Chalmers, argued that the statute of limitation­s had run out on charges involving the 2010 campaign.

But the commission kept alive the allegation­s that he took illegal contributi­ons from the insurance companies and spent money raised for races he never ran, and the Georgia Court of Appeals declined to dismiss the case in June.

Also this summer, the commission filed a new complaint alleging that he illegally benefited personally from the law firm loans. Chalmers said Georgia law states that campaigns can invest funds they raise.

But ethics officials have questioned whether the loans were used to “subsidize” Oxendine’s business and “lifestyle.”

In the federal lawsuit, Oxendine is arguing that state law does not clearly define what is a prohibited use of campaign money. “The statute ... appears to be about what campaign contributi­ons are — not what may be done with them,” the lawsuit said.

It asks for the court to throw out the part of Georgia’s campaign finance law that prohibits candidates from using campaign contributi­ons as “personal assets,” saying it is vague.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States