The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Indictment: Social media firms played by Russians

Tech giants pledge to fix their platforms before next election.

- By Matt O’Brien and Mae Anderson

Friday’s election-interferen­ce indictment brought by Robert Mueller, the U.S. special counsel, underscore­s how thoroughly social-media companies like Facebook and Twitter were played by Russian propagandi­sts.

And it’s not clear if the companies have taken sufficient action to prevent something similar from happening again.

Thirteen Russians, including a businessma­n close to Vladimir Putin, were charged Friday in a plot to interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidenti­al election through social media propaganda. The indictment said the Russians’ conspiracy aimed, in part, to help Republican Donald Trump and harm the prospects of his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton.

The alleged scheme was run by the Internet Research Agency, a troll farm based in St. Petersburg, Russia, which used bogus social media postings and advertisem­ents fraudulent­ly purchased in the name of Americans to try to influence the White House race. The messages also sought to denigrate Trump GOP primary rivals Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, and to support Clinton’s Democratic opponent Bernie Sanders.

“I created all these pictures and posts, and the Americans believed that it was written by their people,” wrote one of the defendants, Irina Kaverzina, in an email to a family member obtained by investigat­ors.

Tech companies have spent months pledging to fix their platforms ahead of the upcoming midterm elections this year, and reiterated those promises Friday. Twitter said in a Friday night statement it is “committed to addressing, mitigating, and ultimately preventing any future attempts to interfere in elections and the democratic process, and to doing so in the most transparen­t way possible.” Facebook thanked U.S. investigat­ors for taking “aggressive action” and pointed out its own role in helping the investigat­ion.

Researcher­s, however, noted that the companies’ business incentives don’t necessaril­y align with improved security and anti-hoaxing measures that might have frustrated Russian agents.

“I’ve never been convinced that these sites are motivated to fix a problem like this,” said Notre Dame business professor Timothy Carone, who added that security controls make it harder for sites like Facebook to offer users new features and keep advertiser­s happy. “It’s a really, really, really difficult problem.”

The indictment confirms earlier findings from congressio­nal investigat­ions that Russian agents manipulate­d social media to promote social division by mimicking grassroots political activity. It also underscore­s that the problem wasn’t just “bots” — i.e., automated social-media accounts — but human conspirato­rs who fine-tuned propaganda and built online relationsh­ips with American activists.

The idea was to “sow as much discord as possible,” said Melissa Ryan, a Democratic social media marketing expert who now keeps track of right-wing online activity. “This was America that was attacked.”

Social-media companies weren’t the only ones subverted in the influence campaign. Federal prosecutor­s allege that Russian criminals

used PayPal as a primary conduit to transfer money for general expenses and to buy Facebook ads aimed at influencin­g voters. Prosecutor­s say the accounts were opened using fake identities to help bypass PayPal’s security measures.

PayPal spokesman Justin Higgs said the San Jose, California, company has been cooperatin­g with the Justice Department and is “intensely focused on combatting and preventing the illicit use” of its services.

Facebook Chief Technology Officer Mike Schroepfer said the company is making “good headway” on the problem, although he declined to give specifics.

On the other hand, now that the Russians have shown how this sort of campaign is done, the door is open for others — including American special interest groups — to use the same tactics to target disaffecte­d voters in the right places, said David Gerzof Richard, a communicat­ions professor at Emerson College.

“This is the new norm,” he said. “It’s not going away.”

 ?? AP ?? Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., shows a poster last year depicting an online ad that tried to suppress voting.
AP Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., shows a poster last year depicting an online ad that tried to suppress voting.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States